avclub-5bbc67c39fbdf1c74e28b86c595f6e4a--disqus
Genji
avclub-5bbc67c39fbdf1c74e28b86c595f6e4a--disqus

But
you
don't
care
but
you
are
still
responding

Steadman will be the astronaut.

Heads and shoulders over the novel, that last in Larry McMurtry's Houston Trilogy. The first two—Moving On and All My Friends Are Going to Be Strangers—are great. Terms of Endearment is godawful. But Brooks molded it into a wonderful old-fashioned entertainment.

So you're just trolling, huh?

Wonder who will play the daughter.

Then why the compulsion to keep responding?

A department store's stock rising or falling is not reporting on pop culture. Yes, when they are covering Stone and Parker's (wise) decision not to concentrate on Trump anymore, that is pop culture news. So is Meryl Streep's speech at the Golden Globes. But this site is bending over backwards to cover Trump anytime it

I actually would be more in favor of this. I may go into a forum following some series once to comment on why I don't like the show, but since that forum exists for the fans, I don't do it more than once (if an article comes out about the show separately from the weekly update, I may comment, since I think that's a

Blessed are the cheesemakers?

Sexy man. It's got to have been a frustrating to have had that career, but he sure made an impression on those of us who saw the original series. Thanks for making my fantasy life happier, Hatch. RIP.

If you're entertained by dying Syrian refugees, should the AV Club run continuous coverage of it?

That was more entertaining than the article.

In entertainment news today, something happened with stock prices for a department store…

Way to switch those goalposts. Nothing there about "Don't criticize Trump" there. And, yes, your interpretation of what I said is pretty clueless. The clear meaning is "if you chose to read this and then criticize it being here, you are contradicting yourself, as you chose to read my comment and then criticized it

I'm a little surprised that The Outsiders was a hit. I guess that makes sense. I saw it when it came out, and so did every one I knew. But I had the feeling it was a sleeper or a flop. Junior high school/high school kids who read the book went to see it, but the mass audience didn't. Wish they'd asked him about the

I never said that, so there isn't any irony. You don't provide a link, but I'm guessing what I said was something along the lines of, complaining about Trump in an entertainment comments section is ineffective and silly. But anyone can do whatever they feel like.

I did actively choose to click on this article. You know my name. We have had many discussions. I've never claimed anyone "made" me read this or any article, and I don't think you can really claim anyone "made" you read my comments or anyone else. A little even-handedness, please.

You don't have a choice? Please. You know my username. You recognize the icon that goes with my username. You can skip my comments if you want. Criticizing having to read my criticism of having to read something is an innate contradiction. You can't have the background you have as an educator and not recognize your

Wah. Wah. Wah right back at you. You realize you don't have to read or respond to my comments, right? You can manage to avoid reading those as well, along with all those reviews you have no interest in.

At least this has something to do with entertainment. The AV Club rarely covers fashion, it's really just another excuse for a "let's stick our tongue out at Trump because that shows we're political" article, but at least this one has some minor reason for existing on this site.