It turns out people didn't want a president—they wanted a GQ profile. Maybe that's why his absence is so painful to the AV Club editors.

If every show and every website isn't about Trump 24/7, he and reality are being ignored?

Except it isn't hitting all aspects of their lives unless they choose to obsess on it. And even if it is, go to a news site and discuss it. Bringing it up here isn't exactly helpful to the situation.

Except what they are doing isn't really political. It isn't providing real information or potentially changing minds. It's virtue signalling. And it's a childish refusal to make distinctions (The New York Times exists for one reason, The Onion exists for another reason, the AV Club exists for a third reason). This…

Been saying this over and over, and get shouted down every time I do.

This is entertainment news?

Weird write-up of Moscow on the Hudson. So your point is that the USSR was really a worker's paradise, but arch-conservative Paul Masursky insisted on celebrating godless materialism, and misrepresented everything?

Googled your info. I'm a liberal gay man who has jerked of to Sorbo a fair number of times, so what you wrote was pretty depressing.

Really nicely put.

Sorbo has kinda a bad reputation because he did God is Not Dead—and obviously didn't do it just for the paycheck. But he's a pretty charming performer and he was good on Hercules, even if Hercules itself was only a so-so show. Wish the guy had a better reputation and glad to see him making an appearance on a show with…

Look at your own responses to me and then ask "why complain about having to read things you don't want to read" You're so tired of reading posts that complain. Maybe if you didn't make yourself read them, you'd have more energy. Try that. Rather than contradicting yourself.

You're so touchy you can't even handle being told that your original post was unclear. Own it and stop throwing insults. It's not that big a deal—it sounded like you were referring to Nixon. Yet you instantly leaped into attack mode. Now you're feathers are ruffled because you think I'm pulling rank about who has been…

Three men were mentioned in the post you're responding to. Thus "he" is unclear. Any English professor would tell you this. And then you got testy because you're lack of clarification caused confusion. I think you're the one wearing cranky pants.

And you're so tired. So very very tired of having to read such things. From so many people. Why can't we just restrict comments to the ones you want to see. It really drags you down.

Nah, I see the herpes outbreak.

"I'm just tired of people whining about AVC publishing articles they don't want to read" Who's the buttercup. Poor you. So tired of people expressing opinions you disagree with. The strain.

Yeah, I know about Harding. I'm the one who introduced the subject. Write more clearly next time.

I should be clear that I'm not saying "The nation loves Trump!" I'm just unsure how to evaluate "public opinion" when all news sources are catering to a viewpoint, and polls often word questions in such a way as to get a desired result. I feel like if I adopt any interpretation out there, I essentially wind up in a…

It's frustratingly childish, though, like the "Should the Oscars Be Cancelled" article today. People are going to whine and whine and not want there to be any more escapist entertainment because Trump's president. They really consider that a sign of political awareness or doing their civic duty. No. Voting. Reading…

Yeah, but narcissists don't kill themselves. I really think the nukes are a non-issue, at least in terms of Trump doing it. Trump inspiring North Korea or Iran to try doing it, however…