Pirates I is a good film. There, I said it.

@avclub-ef870b3a86cdaa4354ae109dd88b614d:disqus Well, I for one agree completely with that.

Good post, that.

Everyone needs to go to TranslationParty.com, which translates back and forth between Japanese and English until it reaches equilibrium (2 in a row the same). The first sentence of the article doesn't reach it, but it gave up after "In principle already. The wayward hedonistic snogging view Thunderously doctor…

Ah, yes, fair enough.

Fair enough. I realized after posting that I basically have no idea what the actual size of either of them is.

You have to stop setting us up with these straight lines…

At the risk of posting a semi-serious comment that isn't about how much I want Tom Hardy to ream me, is there any form of resemblance between him and Elton John at all? I guess he's a good enough actor to make it work, but… I mean, I have no idea but I've always thought of John as kind of short, runty, and ugly.

Got it. Then, isn't it kind of an open question how sustainable it is? I mean, what if it could really replace large chunks of the middleman - you pay far less for music, it goes directly to the artists, they get a larger amount than they did previously. It'll take a while to sort out the details, but isn't it kind of…

Well, a steel spike through the forehead worked for Phineas Gage, didn't it?

I saw Emily Browning sleeping, and she was a beauty, and they arrested me.

With which statement? That "personal" is an unqualified good (which the article clearly disagrees with), or that people raised on the auteur theory think that "personal" is an unqualified good?

So… It's a Zack Snyder film?

Uh… it has excellent qualities, and the visuals are really pretty. But he didn't understand the comic, and I don't mean he's missing it's deep points or whatever. He just literally doesn't know what the book is about.

Are you asking about the sustainability of the AV Club reporting on this, or bands doing this? Because in theory, the latter is an alternative to the entire music industry, and potentially really really really sustainable.

Why is "girl" in quotation marks? Have I been missing a special subtext in that episode?

Chapman's output in the past decade has really been disgracefully small.

Eh?

Somebody pointed this out before, but arms count as legs, presumably, so really you only need 250 people.

Plus, how long is his arm in that picture with Drake?