It revolutionized film. Now instead of costing $150 million dollars, big production hollywood movies will $300 million dollars.

I think a laugh track can only help this. You've got to push the ridiculousness as far as it will go. It should be a 3 camera show filmed in front of a live audience.

I can see Sitcom Chinatown being one of those youtube mash-up thingamajiggers. Like the romantic comedy Shining.

0.999… is absolutely and unambiguously 1. For two reasons:

You know, I'll never understand the general distaste for the Sex Pistols in the punk community.

English is full of technically non-grammatical phrasings that are correct simply because they're common. You might not write "try and" in a legal brief or a PhD thesis, but it's correct in informal writing and speech.

The most fun I had in a theater in 2006 was with your mom.

18 year olds do make great cannon fodder though. Keep defending our freedom, kids!

I think the C+ / B- grade on a "fun" movie is a good indicator that it has laughs but has no merits beyond laughs. I think for a comedy to do really well, you have to imagine people wanting to watch it years from now. This looks pretty fun but disposable to me. C+ is pretty much right on.

Man, can't you guys take this to a more appropriate place? Like anywhere else on the internet perhaps?

I eagerly await big budget 3d sexploitation movies.

If you have an ironically sexist character whose purpose is to let all the sexists in the audience laugh at sexist humor with an excuse, then yes, your movie is sexist.

I liked it better when it was called Primer. And the ending made no sense.

You can't fight city hall…
You can't fight corporate america…

Reading old Bloom County and Doonesbury collections is a good way to see that Ronald Reagan wasn't the universally adored political saint that people seem to think he was today.

Calvin and Hobbes are the only two fictional characters I've ever thought of as my friends.

There's a handful of SNES and NES games I still play more often than modern games.