avclub-566ca5d3a9b79c8ed11fef4550515593--disqus
FoamGuy
avclub-566ca5d3a9b79c8ed11fef4550515593--disqus

This is actually a respectful way to go out, honestly engaging with your fans. Unless being mature means releasing a generic PR written statement and moving on.

Yeah the reviewer fucked up this review cause this ended up being regarded as one of the highlights of the season.

If Illegal immigrants is no longer an appropriate term then why still have borders? Why have immigration laws? Or is it just being replaced with a euphemism?

PC gets people fired from their jobs. Did that persons' family get raped?

I wish you guys reacted like that to online harassment.

You continued to think this after Randy compares "scary" Middle Eastern music to "gay" ninja music? America must be more racist than I thought if that guy who first saw the kids as ninjas is a reaction to black citizens and not outspoken terrorists.

Weeell I could say that there's actually quite a bit of successful entertainment made by and aimed at minorities but I guess those could be dismissed as exceptions or lacking in cultural influence. But what I can do is ask why those examples don't have that same level of influence/praise as entertainment aimed at

That's fair to put that responsibility on them because of their cultural influence worldwide but it still ignores the fact that the lack of diversity in entertainment mostly comes from practical reasons. How is it institutional racism? Where is the justification for the lack of diversity stemming from Hollywood's

In other countries, continents and even just other forms of American media, entertainment representation biases towards the demographic/race/nationality/beliefs of the majority it's funders. Why is Hollywood alone held responsible for not being above pandering to these groups?

Man I miss that animation style. I guess cartoons could be better off now with more focus on dialogue and mythology instead of eye-catching frantic animation and exaggerated voice acting/characters. Might also help the medium to be taken as more seriously and appeal to more demographics.

"Tina Fey has talked about her disdain for perhaps-even-worse SNL host Paris Hilton’s desire to use the show to make fun of her enemies."

That's equal opportunity offending which I believe shouldn't alienate anyone that doesn't want to stifle comedy. They had Hilary Clinton so they can have Donald Trump. They're both poll leaders. I don't see the big deal here unless your that passionate about the media pushing anti-conservative sentiments. I don't

I appreciate the effort to sound less biased but I'm not old enough to be tired Michael Moore's shtick yet so this sounded unnecessary hostile to me.

Thanks for detailed answer. Are these type of topics the only ones that have problems? How slanted/biased is the view towards the editors and is that a significant obstacle to Wikipedia becoming more of an authoritative source of information?

They do need to cite more review outlets. A lot of series just have the AvClub reviewer's opinion on it and I don't think it's right to make it seem like that was the general opinion of the show by critics to less informed readers. Especially when the AvClub is so fond of using their review platform as a soapbox.

If they weren't wouldn't that lend credibility to Wikipedia's critics? I hate people who ignorantly accuse Wikipedia of being unregulated and it's good to here that the volunteers are taking their jobs seriously. It's a serious job, I approve of insufferable nitpicking behavior in this context. Wikipedia will soon

When does Wikipedia suck?

That's an uninteresting target and it seems they didn't even have anything to say about it. Was blind tolerance the running joke? How many times has this show done variations of that? And this time the way Randy got involved is lazier than usual.

Oh come on this was not better than last weeks episode. Or maybe I just didn't get it.

What the fuck? They can do that?