"Take a look at his girl, she is way to hot to be working in a Blockbuster Video."
"You are right, she should be working with us, undercover!"

No, Rabins style was to give in depth attention to his choices and to give a fair day in court to movies that may not have had otherwise.
I loved his take on Clifford, for example.
There were a few movies in his book that seem washed over, he wasn't trying.
However he got my money, so it seems I was the 'Fiasco'.

I keep waiting for him to say "In this world …. the bad guys can win!!!"

No he didn't. He seemed to have missed the point of the movie entirely.
I used to hope he would get around to LAH in one of this entries because if anyone could give the movie the attention it deserved, it was him.

I had fond memeories of this movie, I turned 16, got my license, and this was the first movie I drove myself to see.
I have always thought it was better than it's reputation and that if people gave it a chance they would like it. Charles Dance owns it in this movie. Plus, Arnold is doing a level of self parody that…

Or he could be a serial killer and be Dixter.

I think that's what gets me about the whole 'Brody has to prove his innocence' angle, the fact is he is not innocent.

The cartoon was cancelled before it aired, I remember as a kid it was listed in TV Guide and there was even a teaser commercial but it was pulled due to parents having a fit over it.

A network should pick this show up and show it back to back with the Garbage Pail Kids cartoon from the 80's.

I was going to comment on this episode earlier but I lost my shamrock pen.

*scribbles down start watching Strike Back*

I'm also working my way through and I'm just finishing Season 10.

Which is funny because in the Simpsons book, half the original staff claim that the show started to decline and 'wasn't the same' after the introduction and strengthening of those supporting characters.

Not Lenny!!!!

I think it would have been an interesting idea to go that route, they could have established in season one that they were doing an alternate history by killing someone we knew lived.

I love the show, but I can see where Buscemi does not do it for people in that role.  Me, I would have liked to have seen Kelsey Grammar play Nucky Thompson.

I agree.  I think one issue, which I don't see as an issue but some may, is how the show can only do so much within the confines of history.

It's hilarious because everyone comlained about too much Margaret and not enough Chalky or Harrow in season 3, now through 3 episodes of season 4 there has been zero Margaret and plenty of Chalky and Harrow, and people are still unhappy.

It's a shame the baggage that movie carries with it due to how effective of a horror movie it is.

I would have liked to hear his thoughts on Clownhouse.