Doyle's story. singular.
Doyle's story. singular.
I've said it elsewhere here, but this seemed like the Junior Novelization of A Scandal in Belgravia. It even had 8 pages of color pictures.
@Whovian I would explain, but I am not sure I could keep it brief enough.
This wasn't a review. I feel like I just read the junior novelization of this episode, it even had 8 pages of color pictures. Next week you should just post a link to some transcript of the entire episode and call it a review.
This is the third tl;dr from you I've seen on this page alone. I imagine you do this at libraries and bookstores too. In fact, I love the idea that every book in your local library has been marked tl:dr, and you just cross that out as you go through them.
Is there anything he didn't reveal? Sometimes I will read a review before I watch something. If I hadn't watched this back in January, I would be so pissed right now. No review should be this spoilery.
I think Craig J. Clark just won.
I was once in a movie like this. It was called Satan's Cannibal Holocaust, and had nothing to do with Cannibal Holocaust. I have to wonder how many people are fooled by movies like those.
You know, as opposed to Evil Dead 2, or Army of Darkness.
EVIL DEAD!
The being there in person was a big part of it. I was excited to see Hardwick, but was a little pissed that the Q&A was cut so short because of him. I had a real corker of a question lined up.
@ Evan Waters, I'll admit the vaccination thing is troubling. However he's not quite gung-ho Jenny McCarthy, "They're evil, they must be stopped!"
I saw him interview Patrick Stewart last year at Chicago Comic Con. It was pretty amazing.
What bigotry?
RE: MyNameIs… As an anti-theist, I think most of what the guy has to say on religion is brilliant. His movie Religulous might be the only movie I've seen that I think is both hilarious, and too depressing to watch.
If you don't get that Michael Malone was a straw man of Michael Moore… I don't know, you don't understand things that are easy to understand.
The big difference is Maher and Rock can attack ACTUAL ideals. If you have to use a straw man argument, you're pretty much always going to be wrong. If you hate him because he is a liberal, and not something specific he said or did, only then are you being hateful. Also, Maher and Rock are funny. It's pretty clear…
Maher is all right in my book. Nobody likes a guy who acts like the smartest guy in the room, which is a shame for a guy like him who is usually the smartest guy in the room. Then again I am a pinko atheist, so I might be skewed a bit.
How far down the rabbit hole do you want to go?
The show has done some unrealistic stuff in the past, but it was usually a character getting away with something they would have gotten into trouble for in real life. So when they have a character start flying, I thought, "This had better have a damn good explanation."