I read the article. My argument is that there are three sides to every story. In this case, hers, theirs, and the truth.
I read the article. My argument is that there are three sides to every story. In this case, hers, theirs, and the truth.
I would be interested in the other side of this story. If SGS was so interested in getting rid of Jeremy, why was the S1 cliffhanger about him and Rachel's mom? And I said this a couple weeks ago, I know that social media and the general audience can be at odds, but I struggle to believe that Jeremy was so popular…
I really think it's developing into something more. Sure, it's White Tash Gothic, but there's a real soulfulness underlying it all.
I'm a little disappointed the Sofia spinoff doesn't involve Josh's dopey brother but I wonder about "Young & Hungry" without her given that it's not exactly Veep now.
There's an interview with one of the exec producers, Stacy Rukeyser, on Flavorwire that for some reason Disqus won't let me link to. Please tell me I'm misinterpreting the the last two answers.
Also, the 24/7 quality of Big Brother gives the show a tremendous amount of raw material. Certainly, some production happens in the Diary Room, but it's less important because you're able to craft an hour out of all that. Here, they have to produce the dramatic moments and then edit it to what they want. All in…
I think this problem is tied to Quinn though who operates as sometimes co-protagonist, when she's not really constructed for that. It's very difficult to give her a character arc independent of Rachel. Getting "worse" doesn't exactly add layers for her the way it does Rachel. Therefore, she's endlessly tied to Chet,…
I agree fake mother was the low moment of the entire series in terms of realism.
So long as Appleby/Zimmer are giving great performances, I'm fine. And there is enough interesting psychological warfare to keep me invested. I do hope they put at least some effort into the supporting characters next season.
My first question: Did Dominique have a line of dialogue before tonight?
The first thirty minutes are terrible, and the flashbacks are as bad as the review suggests. The movie picks up from there, and Skarsgard is strong with the physicality. There's a good scene where he meets lions. Waltz wanders into self-parody, but Robbie is appealing so much so I wish we got more of her and Tarzan…
Black police officer.
This show ran aground the same way Scream and Scream Queens has before it, placing all their efforts into translating the Final Girl archetype to TV - now with annoying flashbacks! I expect also like those two shows no one we care about will be killed.
To get meta, SGS treats the characters like reality show contestants - Is Chet a populist idiot savant or just an idiot? Is Jay the conscience of the show or just like Rachel? Does Adam want to be reunited with his family or not?
More appealing sure, but Rachel/Adam's weird chemistry could bear a lot more narrative weight than Darius's football career - although jury's out with how they handle the paralysis fear.
Worst thing to happen to this show was Johanna Braddy being cast on Quantico.
If they were going to have a twist of a new Suitor, they would've done it by now even if Adam isn't technically new. I think the paralysis is a sufficient fear to hang over the rest of the season.
There are things to defend in this episode. I'm intrigued by Hot Rachel's gameplan and whether Ruby and Jay worked together on setting up Darius or it's just Jay. The Rachel/Quinn stuff still works. But they desperately need Kim Matula's character as Suitoress next season.
I think trading one sibling being married to the monarch for another is a pretty fair trade for the Tyrells. And Dany has dragons, and the Lannisters don't.
I would imagine Tyrion's original plan was to marry Dany to Loras. He has a powerful family, and the support of the one person who may be able to defeat dragons and an army, Randyll Tarly. Also, it's not like the marriage is for love anyway.