I'm at least vaguely convinced that Jesse ends up killing Walt.  Even more vaguely, I see it happening with Hank in the room.  Walt's pointing the gun at Hank, Jesse shoots Walt, REDEEMED BITCH.  Or Jesse, Hank and Walt are in the same room, Jesse's the one with the gun and Walt's trying to spew his bullshit to get…

I still think Jesse is going to be redeemed.  His conscious has come knocking ever since he shot Gale, and the knocks just get louder and louder.  Granted, this has been a redemption that's definitely come in fits and starts, but who else on the show other than Jesse is actually trying to wash their hands of all this…

I look forward to transitioning from the dark wasteland that is 'Breaking Bad' to the dark wasteland that is 'Homeland.'  And if these kinds of lands are too bleak for me, then I will play a game of Candyland to even things out.

I think you're reaching if you call that a classic album.  Good album?  Yes.  But in twenty years, nobody is going to be listening to it.  For it to be a classic album, has to stand the test of time.  Regardless of my snark, I am sure I will acquire this bird/plant album, listen to it a few times, be OK with it, and…

There is not enough water in the world to wash the chum off my hands.

The Internet Media unleashed this shitty meme upon us.  AV Club, you are sadly one of the guilty parties.  Now it has jumped the shark (so to speak) and we're stuck with this thing existing in our world for the foreseeable future.  Fantastic.

Appears to be a normal comment section to me.

I know you're not supposed to judge a book by its cover and all that jazz, but what an awful title.  How could this possibly be a good album with that title?

There's a big leap from "not looking at listings" to "choosing to see 'Grownups 2.'"

Catch a break?  That implies that there is something outside of his control when it comes to his movie choices.  He can control any break catching that occurs.

I've never understood the cult following of 'Office Space.'  It's a slightly above-average comedy, not much more than that.  Then again, I don't really understand how cult followings work in general.

Successful (and decent) television series that Steven Spielberg has been attached to.  And…go!

Who actually pays money to see this crap?  This movie, in all of its lackluster-ness, is going to make millions of dollars.  That is depressing.  Millions of American dollars will be spent on 'We're the Millers' after millions were already spent on 'Grownups 2' and such.Yet I don't think I've ever met somebody who…

No.

"Spielberg has also just finished giving notes on the latest draft of Jurassic Park 4."  It's bullshit that we haven't had a dinosaur movie in a decade.  Please let this not suck.   We don't need another robot movie, zombie movie, alien invasion movie, overblown superhero movie or Despicable Me movie.  Dinosaurs.  I…

I watched 'A Night to Remember.'  Been a few years, but watching it didn't make me think any differently about 'Titanic.'  I have no problem with long movies.

The backlash that I'm seeing in the comments was in no way predictable.

'Titanic' is great.  How can anybody hate on that movie?  Yes, it's overblown romantic melodrama.  Yes, the acting is pretty bad in places.  So what?  Billy Zane is an enjoyable baddie who hams it up to the extreme, the special effects are awesome, Kate Winslet has breasts, etc.  If you're going to make a movie about…

'Inside Llewyn Davis.'  The early reviews have been very good (granted, only 23 total on Rotten Tomatoes so far, but it's drawing 91% off of that).  Any wintertime movie that is steeped in melancholy and general downtrodden vibes tends to be up my alley—can't be having too much joy around the holidays.

Put an image of the explosion on the cover?  Dismembered victims?  That's far less professional.  That would be going for tabloid sensationalism, pure and simple.  I really don't see why it's Rolling Stone's job to make sure that people see the cover and say, "Whoa, that's a bad guy!  Look at how unflattering that…