Dammit, and I was so ready for him to start voicing Ned Flanders.

Those algorithms that generate new tweets out of existing ones are really doing a number on our collective psyche. Soon, the only person able to pass the Turing test will be Shia Labeouf, but only because he'll pretend to be too avant-garde for our word salad.

"The show will go on, made by people who love it"

Don't worry, I got that.

I'm digging the "Reasonable Arguments" tag, but this seems to be the only article labeled with it. It surprises me greatly that a website about pop culture
would not be home to the most reasonable of discussions.

Yeah, it's a shame it's not on TV for large parts of the US, or I really would have loved to see the show reviewed on here. I'm in Europe and catch the show through more or less legal ways online - if you aren't bothered by that, you should really give it a watch that way.

Thanks for the reviews. I haven't watched a full RAW in ages and am always thankful for being told which matches are worth catching.

You're probably right about that. In my mind those are still SC&P accounts that came with the buyout, but there was definitely some work involved on Pete's part. What I was going off was the impression that he basically put the entire agency on his back in the old firm, so he still isn't nearly as vital to McCann, but…

Getting caught might be as much a personal as a legal issue. For done, the legel indictment he would face is equivalent to, well, basically being judged by God, or whatever he does or doesn't believe in.

I'm wondering if Pete was looking for a replacement family in the subsequent iterations of S-C. You could look at his anger at being swallowed by McCann as fear of not being a big fish in a small pond anymore, but his fierce loyalty to Don and his thirst for approval from guys like Roger and Bert suggest to me that…