avclub-3e91970f771a2c473ae36b60d1146068--disqus
CarbonYeti
avclub-3e91970f771a2c473ae36b60d1146068--disqus

I don't mean to sound negative, but you could perhaps look at it as a positive that you put the brakes on before they started the price negotiations, which no doubt would have run on the expensive side.

Just chiming in on Fortitude, again, because hot damn does that show need love.

I see what you did there.

Thanks, I remember Dawes talking about the spacesuits and the scarring (Naomi's neck tat resembles Dawes' scar) but I missed that hair could be involved. This show really requires you to pay close attention, and sometimes I can't quite catch all the dialogue - I don't think it's just the Belter Creole either, it's

From what I can tell, that long-on-top, short-on-sides cut is just in style in that time, for men and women both. I've seen a few background extras with it. Perhaps it's a style which makes more sense in low-G, where the mass of hair on top can float - I haven't noticed if any Earthers have it.

Says noted AVClub commenter "Dikachu".

Challenge accepted.

BAILAMOS!

Relax, it's only happened twice.

My issue is not whether you can come up with an explanation plot/universe-wise; since the Thing appears to retain the memories of its victims, then if it infected the ship crew, it "knows" now how to build and fly spaceships, even if it didn't before.

This would be a good explanation (kind of like the xenomorphs and Space Jockey), EXCEPT Wilford Brimley-Thing is somehow building a small flying saucer out of helicopter parts and oatmeal. It's the one bit of the movie I am not crazy about, the monster is much more terrifying and believable as more or less an

When Duchovny became our first celebrity "sex addict", all those old references to Mulder's porn habit suddenly seemed…different. I wonder if Duchovny pushed for the inclusion of that character tic.

You're on the list, Dan Snyder!

No!

I think it was the recaps here that catalogued each week's Tucci smirks. It was great.

Fortitude was awesome.

That's a valid viewpoint, and one I figured was coming. I'll only say in my defense that surgery to breasts is de facto more invasive and risks nerve damage and therefore sensitivity loss, something not true for makeup or tattoos (it's why I'd also urge caution in excessive piercings of erogenous organs, though again

Upvoted for Pusher trilogy, which it seems many here haven't seen, and should.

The Pusher trilogy is also excellent.

stock stylistic bag of tricks