Not a good job at all, Internet. Common knowledge among anyone who's read more than a book with pictures. Shame!

He also made a botch of it. Batch botch.

Cumberbatch did a bit of a drama school movement class jette there.

And grossness.

I concur that the internet has indeed done a great job here. Carry on.

This kid's picture oozes awkwardness.

But don't most "gay" Hollywood comedies wind up being nothing more than 'laughing at the funny gay man'? Since doing that is offensive nowadays, I imagine stuidos wouldn't want to back them. A comedy that deals with everyday gay issues just isn't interesting to a mass audience —and not worth the considerable…

You no likee?

At least I'm not adopted…

Bet she still cashed the checks.

The critic here attributed some of the jokes to the credited writer of the episode, dumbass. Did you read the review?

Actually, yes. I'm also trying to point out that as much as sophisticated folks like us thought that film sucked, a large part of the movie going public liked it enough to see if more than once. The other thing is, as much as this sucks, the only reason Hollywood movies exist is to make money. It's show business.

I can't take a review seriously that thinks the credited writer of a Simpsons episode is responsible for all the jokes and the story. Are you aware of the concept of a writer's room? Why do I keep coming back to the A/V Club. You guys suck.

Except for the people who contributed to the 230 million dollar domestic gross.

They made more money internationally with Into Darkness than they did with the first one. How exactly was it fucked up?

Bad trailer. Where's the jokes?

I would hate to have to review this show. They lost me in the first scene when they set up the world we're watching with an INEFFECTUAL VOICE-OVER.

He screws pans.

Looked like a 2nd Unit greenscreen shot or something.

You win everything.