This show hasn't been good since the fish fry episode, and a D is still a bit generous. One more like this and we will probably not see another season.

I'm not sure who deleted the comment, but it wasn't me. To repost to "This comment was deleted."
"It would have been a B+, if it wasn't for the belt around my neck. Thanks to the oxygen deprivation, it was better than this show".
Is joking about AEA frowned upon by the moderators here?

Some day, in like, ten years, there will be so much good content, that you will never be ever able to watch it all during your natural lifetime. I already listen to podcasts at 2X. Is Hannibal anywhere close to True Detective, or , tellingly, Boardwalk Empire?

My day was not so bad after this.

Just a half-callback to his or her username. My apologies if an offense taken. @SexyJewsus:disqus

Do you think Hannibal, the TV show, is worth watching? Not judging, I'm personally getting mixed reviews.

You adore Girls, great! I'm saying it sucks how much flak Lena Dunham is catching when she really should be celebrated. How many other women are producing and/or directing HBO series? Sometimes the Lena criticism goes over the edge, the hate. That's when I get perplexed, and start wanting to challenge views.

Kudos, Wad. You articulated something in a way many others refused. I'm not that narcissistic, though.

That's all you got?

You, Grrr.Argh, and I, that's three people here who don't absolutely hate Girls. Point being, some folks are treating Broad City like the TV show equivalent of the second coming of Jewsus Christ, and Girls almost as Satan incarnate. Neither are true.

The point is, there is a lot of negativity thrown at Girls, mainly because of Lena, it seems. The show is a pretty good dramady, and Broad City fans more often than not, hate Girls, some admitting they haven't even watched it. That's like Yelper's who give 1 star reviews about a place because a friend said they got…

Ha! That's good. That's better than most groaners on the show. My point was that Chuck Lorre overproduces his shows to the point where there is no soul. Juicing the laugh track just being a facet, and nearly every line gets a laugh. I don't remember it being like that at first. When I finally noticed some years…

Unacceptable answer. There is no way she, and her show, can be so terrible, and Broad City or Big Bang can be inversely better. There are many comments that decry Girls as trash, and praise Broad City the very next sentence.

Word. Funny or Die did a bit on Two and a Half Men without the laugh track, to tell you what was funny and when to laugh. I felt dirty after that. This show follows the same lame format.

To all the Girls despisers, what's with all the negativity for Lena? Is this a hipster on hipster hate crime thing? It's almost like she got too famous before you could say she was cool, therefore, she sucks. Did she not pay her dues? Is she too "privileged"? Please help me understand. A somewhat frumpy girl who…

Word. Maybe if I were a little less intelligent, lived in NYC, or had NO sense of humor, I could wrap my head around this show. Alas, I am screwed. Hail Satan.

I was TOTALLY wrong about your sense of humor, and this show. I can't wait for seasons 3-9.

It has become some sort of social study to see how long people embrace delusion. Like why Republicans still think Palin is smart, or why MSNBC believed Chris Christy deserved more coverage than Ukraine for like a over month. The Broad City circle jerk is fascinating.

I pity anyone you have ever told a joke to.

This show is not good enough to have nothing worse than a B+ on any of it's episodes. I used to respect the A.V. Club reviews, but this is getting ridiculous. Any of the new Girls episodes are better than pretty much all of the Broad City episodes, and I wouldn't give every Girls episode a B+ or better. Come on,…