avclub-3b3fff6463464959dcd1b68d0320f781--disqus
Hypothetically...
avclub-3b3fff6463464959dcd1b68d0320f781--disqus

Well, for one thing, EW used to have art. Real art. Instead of photos, sometimes they'd use paintings. They were really good — some were multimedia creations that, for instance, would use springs as hair — others played with color. It was one of the subtle things that made the magazine worth the cover price.

Starbucks charges for Wifi?
God, this makes me so happy I think their coffee tastes like commoner slurm… which kinda explains why I didn't know that.

nnnoidea
Oswald is not public domain, some sportscaster got his contract traded in exchange for the rights to the character… Al Michaels, apparently.

What phalex said
I was raised on the three caballeros — I'm half brasilian — and watching that cartoon now was trippy. Donald Duck is a borderline attempted rapist in that flick. Joao Carioca is intense though, and so is Carmen Miranda's little sis. I'm going to hear myself mentally ask everyone "have you been to

Completely agreed.
I used to get hit on constantly by older guys who assumed I was in my twenties in 1997 because of my love for damn near everything on this list. This made me re-listen to some old standbys.

Am I the only one
Or do touch screens hate others as well? None of them ever register my touch, or if they do, the aim is terrible. And, to keep with the Simpsons theme, it's not that I've ever needed to obtain a dialing wand by mashing a keypad. Touch screens don't believe I exist.

Propagandist.
Hell, I laughed. Methinks ursus is just a foul rake.

Hey Miller
I'm totally with you. I love "Over the Top" but I sure as hell know it's not good, and I wouldn't want anyone to think I enjoyed it without a healthy dose of irony. I think that's the true definition of a guilty pleasure… anything enjoyed on its own merits that is still horrifically embarrassing should be