avclub-3772bf42ebf9a51da2b8de4746f814e0--disqus
DeafPoet
avclub-3772bf42ebf9a51da2b8de4746f814e0--disqus

We here at What's On Tonight would like to apologize for trusting Nathan Rabin to give us the correct title of the episode he just spent a couple hours writing up. It was a rookie mistake and it won't happen again.

NHL: Leafs.
MLB: Jays.
CFL: Eskimos.
NFL: Beyonce I guess? Maybe the guy who killed the lights at the Superdome? What I'm trying to say is that I watched the Superbowl for an hour this year.

The 1993 Phillies would like to humbly disagree. Then they would like to use you as a beard farm.

"For the Uniform" is indeed awesome. I honestly didn't expect to see too many knocks against it; especially for the dialogue of all things.

Orillia, Ontario.

Nah, my friends and I have wildly divergent taste in TV, so I'd just be explaining things the whole time as @L-o-l-a pointed out.

Final Fringe Friday is my birthday and I love this show so much I'm seriously considering staying in and watching it live rather than going out and painting the town red. And I usually loves me some town painting; so that's saying something.

@drinkingclub:disqus The Observer tech and this chip are different. This one's more of a "Don't fuck around" lo-jack.

This seems as good a place as any to bring this up. I just don't give a fuck about Mad Men. I gave it a shot, I really did. I sat down and watched up to half way through season 2 and then I just kind of never got back to it. The whole time I was waiting for it to click for me and it just never did.

This seems as good a place as any to bring this up. I just don't give a fuck about Mad Men. I gave it a shot, I really did. I sat down and watched up to half way through season 2 and then I just kind of never got back to it. The whole time I was waiting for it to click for me and it just never did.

I always just kind of assumed that. The behavior of the two groups of Observers is so wildly incongruent that it'd be a real bummer if the writers just turned on a dime with "Letters of Transit" and just made them bad guys because shut up, they're bad guys.

I always just kind of assumed that. The behavior of the two groups of Observers is so wildly incongruent that it'd be a real bummer if the writers just turned on a dime with "Letters of Transit" and just made them bad guys because shut up, they're bad guys.

I figured it was a decoy title, since "In Memoriam" is a big neon spoiler.

I figured it was a decoy title, since "In Memoriam" is a big neon spoiler.

@Chico_McDirk:disqus  Actually, I thought Phil "Jackie Chiles" Morris from "Rocks and Shoals" was the best Jem'Hadar actor they ever found. I don't know what the hell he did, but that guy was menacing and sympathetic all at once. And under 10 pounds of shit on his face, no less.

@Chico_McDirk:disqus  Actually, I thought Phil "Jackie Chiles" Morris from "Rocks and Shoals" was the best Jem'Hadar actor they ever found. I don't know what the hell he did, but that guy was menacing and sympathetic all at once. And under 10 pounds of shit on his face, no less.

@avclub-64ad8f3af92ef8d9a1c7dfd7265e577d:disqus Completely agreed. It always baffles me when people say that Abrams Trek is a big dumb action movie. If you watch TOS you'd be forgiven if you thought that there was a stipulation in Roddenberry's contract where he had to write a scene every other episode where Kirk

@avclub-64ad8f3af92ef8d9a1c7dfd7265e577d:disqus Completely agreed. It always baffles me when people say that Abrams Trek is a big dumb action movie. If you watch TOS you'd be forgiven if you thought that there was a stipulation in Roddenberry's contract where he had to write a scene every other episode where Kirk

SPOILERS MAYBE?

SPOILERS MAYBE?