We here at What's On Tonight would like to apologize for trusting Nathan Rabin to give us the correct title of the episode he just spent a couple hours writing up. It was a rookie mistake and it won't happen again.
We here at What's On Tonight would like to apologize for trusting Nathan Rabin to give us the correct title of the episode he just spent a couple hours writing up. It was a rookie mistake and it won't happen again.
NHL: Leafs.
MLB: Jays.
CFL: Eskimos.
NFL: Beyonce I guess? Maybe the guy who killed the lights at the Superdome? What I'm trying to say is that I watched the Superbowl for an hour this year.
The 1993 Phillies would like to humbly disagree. Then they would like to use you as a beard farm.
"For the Uniform" is indeed awesome. I honestly didn't expect to see too many knocks against it; especially for the dialogue of all things.
Orillia, Ontario.
Nah, my friends and I have wildly divergent taste in TV, so I'd just be explaining things the whole time as @L-o-l-a pointed out.
Final Fringe Friday is my birthday and I love this show so much I'm seriously considering staying in and watching it live rather than going out and painting the town red. And I usually loves me some town painting; so that's saying something.
@drinkingclub:disqus The Observer tech and this chip are different. This one's more of a "Don't fuck around" lo-jack.
This seems as good a place as any to bring this up. I just don't give a fuck about Mad Men. I gave it a shot, I really did. I sat down and watched up to half way through season 2 and then I just kind of never got back to it. The whole time I was waiting for it to click for me and it just never did.
This seems as good a place as any to bring this up. I just don't give a fuck about Mad Men. I gave it a shot, I really did. I sat down and watched up to half way through season 2 and then I just kind of never got back to it. The whole time I was waiting for it to click for me and it just never did.
I always just kind of assumed that. The behavior of the two groups of Observers is so wildly incongruent that it'd be a real bummer if the writers just turned on a dime with "Letters of Transit" and just made them bad guys because shut up, they're bad guys.
I always just kind of assumed that. The behavior of the two groups of Observers is so wildly incongruent that it'd be a real bummer if the writers just turned on a dime with "Letters of Transit" and just made them bad guys because shut up, they're bad guys.
I figured it was a decoy title, since "In Memoriam" is a big neon spoiler.
I figured it was a decoy title, since "In Memoriam" is a big neon spoiler.
@Chico_McDirk:disqus Actually, I thought Phil "Jackie Chiles" Morris from "Rocks and Shoals" was the best Jem'Hadar actor they ever found. I don't know what the hell he did, but that guy was menacing and sympathetic all at once. And under 10 pounds of shit on his face, no less.
@Chico_McDirk:disqus Actually, I thought Phil "Jackie Chiles" Morris from "Rocks and Shoals" was the best Jem'Hadar actor they ever found. I don't know what the hell he did, but that guy was menacing and sympathetic all at once. And under 10 pounds of shit on his face, no less.
@avclub-64ad8f3af92ef8d9a1c7dfd7265e577d:disqus Completely agreed. It always baffles me when people say that Abrams Trek is a big dumb action movie. If you watch TOS you'd be forgiven if you thought that there was a stipulation in Roddenberry's contract where he had to write a scene every other episode where Kirk…
@avclub-64ad8f3af92ef8d9a1c7dfd7265e577d:disqus Completely agreed. It always baffles me when people say that Abrams Trek is a big dumb action movie. If you watch TOS you'd be forgiven if you thought that there was a stipulation in Roddenberry's contract where he had to write a scene every other episode where Kirk…
SPOILERS MAYBE?
SPOILERS MAYBE?