avclub-30016cd5b9045be8de99ad5f1cbfd9af--disqus
Lovely Bones
avclub-30016cd5b9045be8de99ad5f1cbfd9af--disqus

My parents completely love it.

That was such a lazy payoff to that bit in his first appearance. It genuinely disappointed my brother. Most of season 6 was solid, though.

There was a big plan for Woodhouse in 7, though, apparently. So maybe they'll bring Kane back?

Contrast to that other poster's point, one of the many things I loved about Floaties was that it made it clear that Margles' death by itself was not what turned Magic Man into a total wad. Going off the entire flashback sequence, which is admittedly a potential recreation, the impression I got was that Margles had

I really thought they'd actually got Slater to do his Nicholson and was super happy about it.

The thing about that scene was that Miller left it ambiguous and that he said he apparently actually intended it as Bruce not killing the guy. The animated version made it more explicit that it didn't kill the guy, apparently.

Well, that's where you get to the point where you thought things through way more clearly than the film did. I ain't defending it. It's pointlessly savagery and sadism.

It's because the mark indicates them as being one of a few things that typically get targeted by other prisoners, i.e. harming children and the like.

But the first of those two were super entertaining and compelling!

Come in Tokyo, come in Tokyo!

That's the article writer pointing out that it'd seem odd, I don't see that as clearer evidence of anything.

Oh, I definitely agree that it's not sensible legality at all, but multiple things I've seen indicate that it is the case. Everyone who isn't Feige on PR campaign says that the Netflix characters showing up in the movies can't happen.

. .No, it's for legal reasons. At least assuming that we take Marvel people's word in good faith here. There's so much fucking ridiculous legal nonsense born of all the willy nilly selling of character licenses decades back, way beyond the fact that Marvel can't do a solo Hulk movie because Universal still has the

At the end of the day it's for legal reasons, so people just have to put up with it. I don't find it that distracting. I also really liked the whole idea that Hulk is Cage's reference point because of the Hulk fight in Harlem.

Oh, there was also apparently that Bullet character on The Killing, but she was like many of us unfortunately killed off near the end.

To some degree it draws a dividing line over having romantic and/or sexual interest in people that aren't cisgender, either of any sort or anyone who's in the middle of male and female.

My friends I mentioned in the other post, as well as other folk I know from our support group, would probably also fall under genderqueer but most of them are more comfortable with vocally identifying as trans.

Queer is essentially meant as an umbrella term that simultaneously includes any non-heterosexuality and any non-cis people, and in addition is sometimes preferred as an identifying term by individuals as opposed to gay, bi, etc., due to a number of reasons.

Oh, well, uh, vague spoiler alert here, both Buffy and Xena have characters die and be magically resurrected. Also I highly recommend Buffy! But have patience with the first season, it had 0 budget and they were figuring out the tone still. It's a short season and should have enough fun in it to get you to where the

Fair enough, I'm sorry for being hard on you.