avclub-2b88c1c9536414bc2c9e43d902eadcd0--disqus
horatio leafblower
avclub-2b88c1c9536414bc2c9e43d902eadcd0--disqus

Do we all watch the same shows?  Or do we all watch *all* the shows.

All the seriously hugely successful people I've ever met have REALLY MESSY personal lives (admittedly this is not an adequate pool of data).  It's a rare creature that can pull that off.  Lots of people can be "reasonably successful" at both.

All the seriously hugely successful people I've ever met have REALLY MESSY personal lives (admittedly this is not an adequate pool of data).  It's a rare creature that can pull that off.  Lots of people can be "reasonably successful" at both.

I've had tempestuous dingleberries, after a drunken weekend camping trip.

I've had tempestuous dingleberries, after a drunken weekend camping trip.

@drdarke:disqus 
Like the MindShrink pitch.  But you're missing the key component of modern broadcast TV shows, which is to have the central character's last name shoehorned into the title:

@drdarke:disqus 
Like the MindShrink pitch.  But you're missing the key component of modern broadcast TV shows, which is to have the central character's last name shoehorned into the title:

I watched this A- immediately after the Breaking Bad A-.  I get that the grades are "relative to the show", but still.  True Blood had some interesting shows in the first couple of seasons.  Bottom line, this was awful and this show itself has become awful.  And I'm upset because I'm running out of stuff to watch.  I

I watched this A- immediately after the Breaking Bad A-.  I get that the grades are "relative to the show", but still.  True Blood had some interesting shows in the first couple of seasons.  Bottom line, this was awful and this show itself has become awful.  And I'm upset because I'm running out of stuff to watch.  I

I think they should do a segment on some local broadcast Morning Show.

I think they should do a segment on some local broadcast Morning Show.

@avclub-8e3b3550b00b4eae43a21cfb2eccf60d:disqus 
I'm on board with the "-" for two reasons:
1. The Scarface scene was crazily on-the-nose, which was probably the point, but still - it just felt off to me.
2. It feels like they're rushing the conflict between Mike & Walt.  It would have more dramatic impact, if they were

@avclub-8e3b3550b00b4eae43a21cfb2eccf60d:disqus 
I'm on board with the "-" for two reasons:
1. The Scarface scene was crazily on-the-nose, which was probably the point, but still - it just felt off to me.
2. It feels like they're rushing the conflict between Mike & Walt.  It would have more dramatic impact, if they were

@Scrawler2:disqus 
Yes - exactly.  I'm talking loud ugly sobbing.

@Scrawler2:disqus 
Yes - exactly.  I'm talking loud ugly sobbing.

The couple of Manic-Depressives I've dating flipped the switch to depressive within seconds of me deciding to give it a shot.  I'm thinking, "This should be exciting!", then they can't get out of bed for a month, and I'm like "get out of bed"

The couple of Manic-Depressives I've dating flipped the switch to depressive within seconds of me deciding to give it a shot.  I'm thinking, "This should be exciting!", then they can't get out of bed for a month, and I'm like "get out of bed"

the ratings might have plummeted though.

the ratings might have plummeted though.

"absolutely horrible" doesn't even begin to describe how absolutely horrible it was to that point.