avclub-2b7cfd7706986f9e0f3e067df9705ba9--disqus
gwahir
avclub-2b7cfd7706986f9e0f3e067df9705ba9--disqus

we all supposed to hate michael cera?! me always found michael cera fundamentally endearing, if a little same-same.

we all supposed to hate michael cera?! me always found michael cera fundamentally endearing, if a little same-same.

@avclub-7aefa9e2af18cd9e2fde628a5e813aa5:disqus can you link me to that? i'd love to see/read it but i can't find it anywhere. (edit: the downer thing, i mean.)

@avclub-7aefa9e2af18cd9e2fde628a5e813aa5:disqus can you link me to that? i'd love to see/read it but i can't find it anywhere. (edit: the downer thing, i mean.)

yeah. to me, way more chilling than the observers explicitly telling peter what a mistake he's made.

yeah. to me, way more chilling than the observers explicitly telling peter what a mistake he's made.

in fairness, he said "undetectable", which isn't exactly the same. they can't see it on their instruments to locate it, but it is visible to them if they're standing in front of it. i noticed it at the time, too, but it's handwave-away-able.

in fairness, he said "undetectable", which isn't exactly the same. they can't see it on their instruments to locate it, but it is visible to them if they're standing in front of it. i noticed it at the time, too, but it's handwave-away-able.

@avclub-83de02c3cfc3634de1279cbc17a8fbae:disqus even with your definition it's a stupid thing to say. this episode or plot point may lack credibility (for you), but you can't make a statement about where the show is going to go or how good it's going to be from here.

@avclub-83de02c3cfc3634de1279cbc17a8fbae:disqus even with your definition it's a stupid thing to say. this episode or plot point may lack credibility (for you), but you can't make a statement about where the show is going to go or how good it's going to be from here.

@avclub-83de02c3cfc3634de1279cbc17a8fbae:disqus i'm nitpicking a bit, but does NOBODY know how to use "jump the shark"?? it's something you can only identify with hindsight. it's the point where the show went from being generally speaking high quality to generally speaking low quality, and you have no idea what the

@avclub-83de02c3cfc3634de1279cbc17a8fbae:disqus i'm nitpicking a bit, but does NOBODY know how to use "jump the shark"?? it's something you can only identify with hindsight. it's the point where the show went from being generally speaking high quality to generally speaking low quality, and you have no idea what the

@avclub-199c40dac30bbdbaa42a8d565f78c136:disqus written but not directed by McDuffie. i seem to remember it being dedicated to him, though.

@avclub-199c40dac30bbdbaa42a8d565f78c136:disqus written but not directed by McDuffie. i seem to remember it being dedicated to him, though.

suppose it depends on which articles/reviews you read. i always read the comments here, love the commentariat at the AVC nearly as much as i love the content itself.

suppose it depends on which articles/reviews you read. i always read the comments here, love the commentariat at the AVC nearly as much as i love the content itself.

the Buffy group was called the "scooby gang", but we can't really know what the writers intended, so, well, you can take it how you want, i guess. if it makes you happy to see a reference, go nuts, otherwise let 'em be.

the Buffy group was called the "scooby gang", but we can't really know what the writers intended, so, well, you can take it how you want, i guess. if it makes you happy to see a reference, go nuts, otherwise let 'em be.

it isn't just demeaning to bad actors. in fact, it's demeaning to all women. bad male actors get parts for whatever reasons, but bad female actors can only get parts by fucking someone? it once again reduces female worth to sexuality. it's ugly and just incorrect. and not funny, for fuck's sake. you didn't even make

it isn't just demeaning to bad actors. in fact, it's demeaning to all women. bad male actors get parts for whatever reasons, but bad female actors can only get parts by fucking someone? it once again reduces female worth to sexuality. it's ugly and just incorrect. and not funny, for fuck's sake. you didn't even make