the first three are right, and the fourth is not. good catch, though. i wouldn't have noticed it without going back and looking for it.

capable and resilient to basically everything on earth doesn't exactly qualify you to be capable and resilient to the effects of zero gravity on the stomach with which, let's be honest, none of us here have any experience.

i clicked on the link because i thought that was bill bailey. how disappointing.

favourite post in this discussion. yes.

sex is always a noun.

bravo, sir.

yeah, i don't understand how it's being covered under "tv club classic" when it's only airing here currently!

i've never been married, but i've been tempted to cheat before. like, a whole lot tempted. i didn't (just), but i sure as hell wouldn't have chosen to keep being friends with the girl.

i've rewatched that exact few seconds now five times and have NO idea what you're referring to.

screw it! save money. have 1970s star wars-quality special effects. and keep making more.

as soon as he turned up in the first scene, i couldn't stop thinking "i know a squealer when i see one."

no doubt the writers named it this to get all of our hopes worked up here at the AV club and get more views on its recap.

i often find product placement less obvious and irritating than the bending over backwards shows do to AVOID showing a particular brand. especially the way they all have to show computer operating systems as being either inconceivably clever and advanced or stone-agedly outdated, with big pixely letters and numbers…

my suspicion is that, realising what a mistake they made getting too involved in the original timeline (starting with the distraction of walternate that started this whole chain of events, and then rescuing peter and walter, and so on), they've backed right off and tried to avoid making any contact with influential…

i came here to post exactly this, and what @avclub-2300d8171ca46be1ee5a72d2837c1b6d:disqus  said.

huh?

this is basically my only complaint with the finale, and it's a big complaint — though it didn't diminish my emotional response to the finale.

what would you have liked that you didn't get?

research is incredibly hard for long-form narrative. you can research
the stuff you KNOW you don't know, like what it's like to have a manic
episode, or sniper techniques, or something, but when there's some
little thing you take for granted and don't even understand that it's
technically implausible, it slips through…

right or wrong, it's a pretty bitchy way for cross to respond to negative reviews.