You're saying I'm not an individual. That I'm not a person. You're comparing me to furniture… no, PART of a piece of furniture. Part of an object. You're asking me what I would like to be called, as this thing that you've decided I am. A special identity that is less than you.

Well, I suppose it's only fair that you get to pick the precise, de-humanizing insult you use about me to aggrandize yourself. And we wouldn't want to mix metaphors, sheeps and tables.

You know, you seem like the kind of person who likes analogies, so there's this one I think you might use: ever thought of calling people sheep? Or "sheeple?" That one in particular is a big hit.

Yes, you are one of a few real human being, and we are zombies. Again, I don't see the relevance, but cool beans, that sounds healthy.

Well, how many souls I have doesn't seem particularly relevant to a review of Grease Live! and your politics based reaction to it, but thanks for the enlightenment.

Now that's quality gobbledigook. You have a manifesto in you, I'm sure.

What does that even mean? Where are we at now? You said something that is untrue about the review, then that didn't matter because semantics and now…

So "they" didn't exactly draw first blood, did they? I mean, unless people should take you unloading all of this issue you have about who you imagine them to be in a very generalizing way with gentle good humour without, god forbid, do anything as mean as calling you "edgy."

Huh… your first comment calls the reviewer "the worst" (sincerely!) throws some dumb references to millenials and tumblr and such, and then you went: "I'm sure you consider lots of things "gross" like most of your peers on
let's say Twitter, who like you are so above all of this "gross" pop
cultural "grossness". Ick.…

PonyafinaWater's original comment had a pretty personal slant about the reviewer right off the bat, so I'm not exactly surprised.

Well, you did call it a "sociopolitical framework," but that's just you saying that. Now it's not politics, right, so you going off on one sentence and mischaracterizing the review is suddenly moot.

I don't know what this is that you think that you belong here more than another commenter that you can tell them to "go back" somewhere?

Having the review it did not seem to me that she did not like it "at all." There's some downright praise in there, as well as criticism; it's essentially a give and take review.

Yeah huh… lets ignore how the review includes that quote AND a B+ grade, I guess. I mean gee, yeah, how outrageous is it that gender politics have obviously knocked Grease Live! down to a B+ grade from the A grade it normally should have been!

"What the hell does 'Grease is the way we are feeling' mean?"

So this is THE episode, overall, then!

"IT’S THE KUMAIL NANJIANI EPISODE, ZACK HANDLEN! Rhys Darby is also present. (Speaking of, you can read an Interview with him right here.) He is playing “Guy Man.” And Tyler Labine is here too, as “Stoner #1."

I want to watch thissss! Stupid Canadian Cartoon Network.

What about the reverse?

Yeah Kyle didn't responsibly use his power, but what happens to the doctor kind of proves he's not lying when he says he didn't want to kill Sanjay.