avclub-228565cd2c91383eebb2bc74e83512d7--disqus
astrid1021
avclub-228565cd2c91383eebb2bc74e83512d7--disqus

i agree completely, he is a monster and watching Jane die and killing Gale killed are proof of this…but you could still kind of sort of explain it as Walt thinking - in his own delusional Machaviellian cold-hearted way - that it was for the long term preservation of his family bla bla bla…but letting Hank die when it

i kept shouting stop that you two (i swear i did this) as if they could hear me and might listen….i did feel a little stupid right after, the tazing was horrible to watch bc i know someone who has been tazed and he was never quite the same after

yeah someone mentioned that in the thread below this and i hadnt seen the oranges, but that pretty much seals it…RIP

if Walt ever becomes ok with idly sitting by what a good, innocent guy who he cares about like Hank gets killed (esp. when he had a chance to save him) then he is evil and we wouldnt  care what happened to him, he would be too much of a different character and the show really wouldnt be the same… part of the genius of

touche:)  but I just want to say that I write this bc 1)  a lot of episodes were graded higher last season and i don't see last season as necessarily better by comparison - equal perhaps but not better 2) guilty. grades do matter to me.   it just strikes me as odd that more people weren't as blown away as I was,

the only reason Ted seems shady in this scene though is that if he doesn't pay he IS going to jail and yet he seems so calm and nonchalant about it - like what in the world does he actually think is going to happen if he doesn't pay?? i would  be doing everything I could to get the money to pay - so I could almost see

you are so right! i missed that…in the post right before this they are debating if ted is dead - but the oranges! yep, he's dead

Hewell (sp.?) called it an "act of God"….what else could that mean?

Mr. Murray, giving this an A- not only undermines your credibility as a reviewer, but it devalues your own review. Giving this an A (like it deserved) is not fanfare, it's common sense. And we had enough "exploration", this plot action came just at the right time, as fast and furious as it should. Vince Gilligan and

lololol actually that only got a B+  :(    seriously, this show, and this episode specifically, makes a whole week of tedium worth living…that's right, it's worth LIFE….i think that deserves an A at the very least

OH..MY…WHAT…THE….i have no….i can't….what the………

sorry - i was replying to the post above speculating as to whether Walt would change his methods and whether he and Gus could co-exist ——and I was just thinking about things that Vince Gilligan says - and from that I get the sense that he is leading Walter towards a certain death bc you can't makes these kinds of

wow this was so bad…i am a little insulted that it gets compared to Mad Men - but obviously I know how and why….Eddie Cibrian seemed like he had watched tapes of Don Draper over and over and over and that was his "research" for creating this character…i have always underplayed John Hamm's responsibility for the

it's obvious to me that Walt will die and that the show is  (as Gilligan has said as much himself - almost like the show is a chemical reaction on Walt changing him from good to bad, alive to dead)…..but i just find it interesting that the way he might go is the cancer after all