I gotta go with the sympathy version out of the musical options.

Well, depending on your specific theology they're potentially a lot more characters than that.

Yeah this was kind of my thinking. Probably rules out the devil from Ivan's fever dream and maybe the devil in Master and the Margarita too.

Google is a popular service, so might as well eat Doritos.

The most normal time to peak seems to be within your first few films and during your 20s and 30s, but it's pretty far from a universal rule.

I very minorly hurt my foot yesterday, and it was shocking just how much and for how long even that non-injury hurt. So uh, lo siento.

Yeah it's pretty weird and noticeable even as a white person and never gets better, sorry. Like you say, it's especially a problem that it's very easy to recognize and picture Alison Brie every time you hear her.

It was pretty ballsy to make the "Thinly-veiled self-loathing Bob Saget show" and then try to get something going with Bob Saget.

I think the finale is the only other episode that's as meta and wacky as the first one. It really is committed to that 3-timeline thing, and maybe it was trying to introduce it in a way that would be weird and clunky, but at least not confusing.

Maybe just start all the way in season 2. I don't actually remember any important plot developments at the moment, so maybe i'm not the best person to ask about that…no wait, some's coming back to me:

You're the Worst is very similar (and good!) despite being about live-action non-horse people. It's a little more optimistic, but is still pretty concerned with depression and trauma and worrying you missed out on living the sort of life you were supposed to want, and that your best days are behind you.

I see some people going through the episode reviews via notifications. I wouldn't bet on having a lot of ongoing conversations there though.

I saw a car the other day at the grocery store with exactly two bumper stickers:

Unfortunately, after they decided enough of the status quo was enough, all that was on offer was more of it, or something even worse.

I like how this form sounds like it means something even when there's no correlation between the people involved.

Well everything you experience, buy, or do needs to express not just who you are as a person but which other people you're opposed to. Please make sure your consumption of products, entertainment, science, and facts all align to make a single party-specific narrative.

I'm pretty uncomfortable attacking "traitors" in this regard. Best case scenario you're demanding that people strategically band together for important goals even if they don't want to, worst case you wind up condescendingly denying someone's actual opinion because you don't think it makes sense given the group…

More of a Biden slogan.

The Walrus disagrees!

I can't tell if you're attacking this person based on your disagreement with his attacking the film's terrible costume job, or attacking him based on some reading where he actually believes Hillary is mannish and has a bad wig and is insulting _her_ and not the film. It seems like an overrreaction either way.