Is it still looking like Trump doesn't cross 51%? I know he's still below 51% of available delegates to date, but there are more winner-take-alls coming up and people leaving the race doesn't seem to have helped consolidate support around a single not-Trump the way republicans hoped it would.

Well, the other candidates aren't exactly the same situation, because they're on record promising to support the nominee no matter who he was, so their case is actually one of prioritizing one kind of scruple over another.

The guy (Tapper i think?) asking him to denounce the KKK and not getting a straightforward answer, then just Jim-facing should seriously consider a career in comedic acting if reporting doesn't pan out.

I disagree. Smart people believe dumb shit constantly. I believe several impossible things before breakfast, because otherwise there's no way i would bother to get out of bed and make breakfast.

It's worth noting that some of those poor (mostly white) people weren't "voting against their interests" so much as "not voting" on those issues. They didn't necessarily buy into the republican economic plan; they were voting for republicans for other reasons, or often in the case of young people, staying home because…

If there was a way to see the answer without getting the consequences, it would be interesting to find out if Ted Cruz would shut down and badmouth the government constantly once he was its chief executive.

See also: the devil (who democrats serve) will promote peace, prosperity, unity, and understanding [in order to seem good] and when he does, these things will be bad, purely because of who is doing them.

I like to imagine Rubio actually had a favorite Wu Tang Member, it was Old Dirty Bastard, and his inability to make unprepared statements combined with an uncertainty of whether or not he was allowed to say "Old Dirty Bastard" just made him freeze. But your scenario is more likely.

Except for the ones Australians already took.

He also must be capable of bulking up some for the role if they ask him to. I mean he probably can't utterly transform ala Chris Pratt or Hugh Jackman, and wouldn't bother to without that sweet blockbuster lead money on the line even if he could, but he can probably get close enough for it to not be distracting.

Well it's something he didn't want to go by. Maybe it's something traditionally female, or a Jewish name that isn't common in the US like Schmuel or Baruch and he was embarrassed of other kids' reactions as a kid. Or maybe it was something that gave rise to additional easy fat jokes while he was fat.

At the very least move the hyphen back a space

I'm not familiar with the implications of Lionsgate as a verb.

As an idiom is just a surreal riff on "dark night of the soul" right? But yes this is the first thing to use this specific phrasing.

Web app I-Ching: best known for ghostwriting the streaming version of Man in the High Castle.

I think i'm willing to believe the failures aren't his fault if he wants me to, but in that case i'm assuming the successes aren't to his credit. You tell me sceenwriters have very little influence on the finished product of movies they don't produce or direct — that's a plausible claim i've seen from several sources,…

They're not here to make friends.

I feel like a shitty hipster stereotype whenever i say The Samaritan stories in Astro City are my favorite Superman, but i think it's reasonable because it's not like he's some big revisionist twist on the character, just an extremely good and totally unlicensed one.

I love DCAU Braniac, but haven't actually seen much of comics Brainiac (mostly because i haven't actually read many superman comics period). But i gather they're very different.

Yes it can and no it can't respectively.