avclub-1f5b519cde67ac0d0fcab419aa3048a4--disqus
vandermonde
avclub-1f5b519cde67ac0d0fcab419aa3048a4--disqus

Spelling issues aside, Pet Semetary didn't deliver any of the animal priest shenanigans i expected.

I saw part of 2 without seeing 1, and thought it was terrible and none of it made sense, but also suspected i was judging it too harshly because i was lost without seeing 1. It turns out seeing 1 did not help much.

He seems like he would be up for it, it's just, no one's asking.

It's pretty strange seeing The Spectacular Now and then catching one of these things. Once you know what they're capable of, It's like they're playing actors who can't act who are in turn playing these characters.

You could get in on even more of that sweet pandering than adult men, if only you were still a teenager. Everyone of both genders is an incredibly special chosen one who no one understands yet but who will one day fix everything and show them all. But only until they're about 16-20.

Yeah it's awful. I'd argue that Magic Mike, despite being a comedy about male strippers, is both better when considered as a serious film, AND was more titillating to me as a heterosexual man. GFE went past being non-exploitative into being like a powerpoint presentation on accounting and schedule managment that just

This is drastically less cringey than Todd Margaret imo. I couldn't handle TM at all, whereas Baskets almost looks like a normal sitcom when you put it next to other Time and Eric-adjacent stuff.

"Good" is going a bit far, but it certainly sounds like an easy movie to make with a lot of competent mediocrity and some camp appeal.

If this succeeds, "The 7th Wave: [subtitle]: Part 2" is going to be the most confusing name for the fourth movie in a trilogy ever.

So does the algorithm just really overrate people with small roles in big movies?

Looking it up, there were a series of significant federal minimum wage hikes in 2006-2009 (also, holy fuck how was the federal minimum wage so ridiculously low in 2006? That shit was considerably below the cost of living in rural nowhere) so it doesn't seem impossible to continue that trend until we're somewhere

He has gotten considerably worse endorsements. Keeping in mind he didn't invite this guy up on stage with him and it's just a one-way street Trump didn't have input on, it still doesn't look very good http://www.smh.com.au/world…

Just do totally static bodies and scenery with the mouths moving, and recycle a ton of shots. It was good enough for the original…

As it's a sitcom, no supernatural evil goes down or anything, but basically this couple tries to have a romantic weekend away, and gets a room at a bed and breakfast, but it turns out they're all theme rooms, and the only available one for them has dozens of creepy dolls stacked everywhere.

I suspect they've got more sunk costs than just rewrites when they reach that point.

How do you feel about the Brooklyn 99 episode with the bed and breakfast?

It could have been worse, you could have melted its face.

It's tough to make it pay off. They're creepy but they're also 3 feet tall, made of fragile materials, and totally legal to destroy as soon as you don't like them. Even if it's not yours, you're still probably just looking at a misdemeanor or a small claims court case.

Whereas "serial killer" would have been fine.

If only Star Wars had a scene where their unsold records bumped into each other.