…and of course, it's easy to get carried away writing headlines."
Oh, you power hungry bitch. B/c the world truly, dearly cares about critics.
…and of course, it's easy to get carried away writing headlines."
Oh, you power hungry bitch. B/c the world truly, dearly cares about critics.
I brought up Accident Lady b/c you asked me to expand on the exposition of the episode. I think her situation was played out to communicate that Alex can only use his power in one way, and will do so even when reluctant.
K. Thrace, see my reply to sarCCastro below. The majority of Alex's episode arc WAS given over to the should I/shouldn't I argument.
Re-read your first paragraph; you just explained it to yourself.
Alex can only remove other's powers by penetrating them with his penis. He is greatly reluctant to do so with women and men, based on his newfound sense of propriety/respect for Jess. Yet he overcomes that not once, but twice to help someone in great…
No, sarCCastro; that is not the legal definition of rape. You seem a little persistent on the point tho, and you're certainly entitled to your opinion. Since the majority of this episode's exposition was giving argument to why it wasn't rape, I go along with what I think the writer's intentions were: to have a laugh…
Challenging the solipsistic is always difficult, but you've really gotta pull your head out of your ass on this. I said I disagreed with your discomfort - a statement about MY feelings. Then an alternate interpretation of the scenario was offered.
If anyone is "trolling" here, it's you, son. Of my 11 comments 3 were…
Is the probation worker a closet case? He did mention in S4E8 that he didn't act on the love of his life, a male.
Forgive me, I was trying to be politely charming. Truthfully I think you're too challenged - mentally or by you're own unresolved sexual issues - to understand the comedy of the show. I'm sure there's a hilarious and obvious episode of Big Bang Theory on your DVR queue that'll soothe you.
Rowan, I disagree with your discomfort. And while it is most definitely non-consensual sex, i'm not sure it's rape. Alex seeks neither control nor pleasure from his act; in fact, the perversity is that he is restoring Finn's power and self-control. I think you're letting your own discomfort with handsome…
For a show that thinks itself soooo smart, why did they confuse the inability to sweat (congenital anhydrosis) with the inability to feel pain (congenital analgesia)?
I've never wanted to meet a group of people less than the authors of this whine-fest…
I've never wanted to meet a group of people less than the authors of this whine-fest…
Pretty sure the science museum was the one in Boston. Waitress was right about Swampscott.
Pretty sure the science museum was the one in Boston. Waitress was right about Swampscott.
actually, I kinda agree with him. not the facial hair, tho.
local hotels
Yeah, like fucking La Quinta upping its rates from an average of $70/night to $186? Plz; SD sucks the cocks of comic-con boys and girls as dry as they can for 5 days, then the SD Tribune spends half the year mocking them.
more like…
you mean "average hung with an enormous girth"?
ugh
Like the world - beyond music critics with shitty taste - needed any more Smiths or Morrissey? I thought we left this behind in college. In the 80's.