I'd accept that as well.

Oh, that's a good point. Physically he's all wrong. But at least in terms of writing they got him mostly okay.

I'll give you Deadpool for sure. I will note, though, that the character originated with Rob Liefeld in the absolute worst part of the original New Mutants run, so he kind of started off with low expectations.

They've never even come close to doing Nightcrawler correctly.

Kelsey Grammer: Nope, except for maybe the voice.
Nicholas Hoult: Ha ha ha, NO.
James Marsden: Maybe? I watched 3 movies with him playing Cyclops and he managed to never make an impression.
Tye Sheridan: Ha ha ha, NO.
Famke Janssen: I love her, but no.
Sophie Turner: Maybe if they give her material.

Not really. I think of mid-to-late Claremont Magneto as the best Magneto, and Fassbender is a pale imitation. Mackellan doesn't get him at all.

There are also a lot of sentences that aren't about the movie at all, as in "Look at this obscure fact I know about someone connected with this film!"

Which I don't really understand, since I thought Kitty was really meant for Rachel Summers. But what do I know…

I would love Mystique in X-Men, but Lawrence's character bears practically no resemblance to Mystique apart from being blue and a shapeshifter. But then again, outside of Wolverine and maybe Professor X, I can't think of many characters the X-Men movies got right.

They are definitely on Comixology. The one-shots are interesting little side stories, but the main attraction is definitely the present-day plotline of the 7 main series.

This is the one comic I recommend even to people with zero interest in comics. It's that good, I promise. You won't regret getting into it.

I have the whole thing on Comixology and generally wouldn't be a bookshelf set, but I would buy the whole thing as one omnibus edition.

If you have never read it before, you're in for a treat. It's one of the best comic series I've read, hands down, and the only one I would unreservedly recommend to anybody, whether or not they've ever picked up a comic before.

Unless you provide a citation and link, we can't be sure one way or the other.

To be fair, he also handed over a lot of control to his VP, who was a known psychopath. Morally speaking, GW was not blameless.

I thought it was a given that it didn't do any good. My criticism was just that it was stupid.

I feel like the DC movies are a long string of easily avoidable mistakes.

That dream sequence was terrible from a filmic and storytelling standpoint, but it was certainly unforgettable.

So, this restaurant review was dumb and pointless (did anybody think the Trump Grill was a marvelous place to eat?), unless the point was actually to show how easy it is to bait Trump on Twitter. I really hope that was the purpose, but I get the feeling that this was just feel-good, Internet echo chambers sniping,…

Need? No. May benefit from? Still probably no. Will have your world shaken by? Possibly.