avclub-0adf06020b0e5f2dfaea8d6be38b31a1--disqus
Wade
avclub-0adf06020b0e5f2dfaea8d6be38b31a1--disqus

I'd kind of like to watch this clip, but it's Aasif Mandvi, and I just can't deal with him this early in the morning. He's always shouting. Why is he always shouting? You're wearing a microphone, Aasif. We can hear you.

Not necessarily. It's always been exacted as good as I remembered it, because even when I originally saw it at age 12 or whatever, I never saw it as some untouchable classic, just a fun movie with some good lines and some neat sequences.

People who are trying way too hard to assign deeper meaning to a Stanley Kubrick movie, because they are way too invested in assigning an otherworldly genius to him, and can't accept that he would do something as merely mortal as make simple genre piece.

Damnit, I probably should have skipped that one seeing as I haven't watched it, and figured I might at some point.

Which would have suited Roger Ebert, as he singled that moment out as a point of criticism. He seemed to think it would have been more poignant that way, whereas I think it would probably have just made everyone in the theater either really uncomfortable, or break out in hysterical laughter.

Let me fix that for you…

I was wondering if somebody would remember that. Yes, that is my go-to analogy for how much my girlfriend hates these sorts of movies. Good catch.

"I don't think this is going to work. Let's scrap it."

My girlfriend would rather eat broken glass out of a French Quarter urinal on Mardi Gras than watch a movie like this.

You are of course entitled to your own opinion, but you at least have to be aware that it puts you in the 1 or 2 percentile of the population, in the same range as climate change deniers, and people who thought Hitler's Final Solution was a pretty good idea. Now, I'm not equating your views on McCartney with those

It's not Peanuts, but it is a Roald Dahl book, and many of them have been made into big budget studio films.

A great idea, but after the box office returns of Fantastic Mr. Fox, I would guess the big studios aren't going to let Wes Anderson near another high profile children's property.

We're going streaking!

Collective Soul overall was collectively shit, but Heavy did have a pretty bad-ass riff.

Henry Winkler is one of those people, like his late, close friend John Ritter, who I find enormously likable and talented, despite having been involved almost exclusively in dreck. So I will be rooting for this show, although I suspect it will be completely horrible. I mean, there's plenty of shit on TV; at least it

Seems like a lot of work for twenty bucks and change.

I hope that they are thorough enough to color in his alcoholism-related jaundice.

See Dead Alive for this answer. Or for any other reason. It's all sorts of awesome.

I'm pretty sure all rules set by corpses are unspoken.