That's how the rest of Gawker works, so I wouldn't hold out much hope.

Originally, you didn't even have a unique username. You could put anything in the name field, and it wasn't password-protected. Truly the golden era of commenting.

I just hope that the central mission of the website gets watered down while unoriginal, shallow political stories become the main focus.

Ok, thanks for confirming you're just some edgy alt-right troll.

Have you visited her twitter page?

It's troubling that you only identified females for your twitter "totally not harassment" campaign.

If display names don't have to be unique, how do you prevent clone or imposter accounts?

Uh, hello? Were you not around when Obama was president? I saw so many ridiculous names, most of them racist.

This is a big problem I have about it. Progressive don't fall into those sorts of bad habits (like name-calling) like conservatives do. I think it's because of the correlation between education/intelligence and a liberal viewpoint.

Will any opinion that is moderate or, heaven-forbid, conservative be filtered out? I know Kinja is really good at enforcing a uniform political and cultural view point. That will be nice. I think we can all agree that we shouldn't be exposed to conservative viewpoints.

I'm not following you.

You probably believe the holocaust is fake.

Please enlighten me. What did you mean by the comment?

You sound pretty tough.

So Xanderpuss was metaphorically reveling in the threats against Coulter?

"Fuck 'em. Let them die up on their imagined crosses."

But her tweet referenced above was advocating violence in response to violence. So by your rubric, that's morally acceptable.

Yes. Putin hired me.

And that was wrong of him to do. It seems that you also think it's wrong to encourage violence. So that makes me wonder why you are reveling in the threats against Coulter.

Not sure what you mean