Either Elitist Trash has misread Shame or I have.   Fassbender's pathological bed-hopper doesn't ignore his sister's cry for help because he's addicted to porn, but because they're both survivors of some unspecified horrible abusive childhood and he can't bear to deal with her or it.   He also can't have sex with…

I got the impression plot points were getting a little compressed towards the end of Pontypool the film, so I can believe there was a lot more in the book.

"assembling a dwarf-sized army of the dead"

At what point would he contact the authorities?

I can't decide if that's the best or worst way to first see one of my favourite movies.

I'm sort of impressed, in a script for a movie called Django about a character called Django, that Smith or his agent was able to identify Waltz's character as the stealth lead whom everyone was going to remember (and give an Oscar to).

I enjoyed Abrams Star Trek in the theatre, but I read some major Trek fans' criticisms at the time.   Since then I've seen some Star Trek episodes on repeats and the more I think about it the more I feel like they were right.

According to [i]John Dies At The End[/i], Homo Sapiens is being sytematically prepped to go on shooting rampages by sinister forces that want to wear down our resistance to killing each other.

I don't know if I would have bought Redford as a struggler (although I agree it would have been great to see).   The husband in RB is just such a perfect scumbag.

I think getting cast as a villain is actually a mark of respect.   Theron, Roberts, Jolie etc. have all earned the right to actually play a character in a movie, where the role of protagonist goes to the latest pretty face.