Well, now I need to start making a list.

I have a few tracks from Eva, but I've never given the whole thing a listen.
Komm Susser Todd will make me tear up.

With the CB ones it's less that I have them and more that there are 7 albums.
And with FLCL it can be a bit cringe-inducing if I'm the car with someone and one of the sketch tracks come on.

I'm a little ashamed that I still have all the Cowboy Bebop and FLCL soundtracks in my random playlist.

Ironically, Dave Nelson would have used a Green Acres reference too.

In other hilariously dickish news, I just read this article about EpiPen's price gouging, which contains this excerpt, with its perfect combination of the modern worlds lurching towards a less civilized age and the NY Times' insistence on being proper and unvulgar:

I'm more concerned that they seem to have quietly executed Watch This.

Or hell, just create a new feature "Late Night Round-Up" or such.
Then they can post all the Oliver, Bee, Colbert and Myers clips in one place on an expected schedule. Because surely, "Television Show Airs at Normal Time, Discusses Topics in its Purview" is not "news."

It's real odd to establish that there are only a dozen or so Monks, then kill a few in the final assault. At that point you might as well win the war through conventional means.

I think he plays a critical support role. It's not impossible for Furiosa to reach The Green Place without him, but its a lot more difficult.

No one is talking about other issue the ad campaign raises. The degradation of the English language.

He seems to want to remove parts of a National Park without the level of oversight or documentation that would be required of anyone planning a multi-day camping trip in one of the parks.

All I can think about now is the live episode of 30 Rock, where he's just mugging in the background of the flashback scene, while Fallon "acts" in the foreground.

Consecutively? That's insane.

Isn't that the guy who opened trade relations with Japan?

Well shit. When did that happen?

I was intrigued by it at first: a way to explore the mistakes Scott made; and how Hank was just as morally compromised but refused to admit it. I mean he completely fucks up the timeline just to rub Scott's nose in the fact that he ended up doing as Xavier did, rather than as he said.

I've always held that Star Trek stories should feel like fables. They need to present moral quandaries or political quagmires and then solve them using goodness and right-thought.

This feels like an odd line of questions to go down, considering her show was My Life on the D List.

I believe that's called CancerAIDS. And, as a preexisting condition, it is no longer covered.