Refs just threw a flag on the hawks for holding just reading this article

Fact still is the fast charging degrades the batteries and you should do it as little as possible. Going even higher power than the supercharger network will only make it worse long-term with current battery tech. 

Fact is all Tripp would have to do is get his hands on ONE model 3 that he claims it happened to, since he supposedly has the numbers, and have the battery broken down to prove it. If his claims are even remotely true he’d have already done this but....he hasn’t. 

Just like the camaro all they need to do is make that cross bar black or body color! 

the listing was almost assuredly a scam

How much is the “fully welded frame” option? 

The only possible use of this thing is for off-road schools to use. Worthless for anyone else. 

As time goes on people forget how mediocre of a QB Colin Kaepernick was. He’s been out of the game far too long now to come back anyways. He seriously was NOT a good QB when he played. Especially now that defenses are used to running QBs

That wasn’t a PIT by the way....

Sorry this article is such a smear job. They’re not an unlimited car, the “unapproved fuel” thing was never supposed to exclude them, it was an oversight by the organizers and some jerk protested due to that. They did the right thing, refuse to go up to unlimited and instead stay in THEIR APPROPRIATE CLASS. 

This is a good thing. Amazon has a major issue with counterfeit products, especially with Apple chargers and accessories. 

The fact that Mecum knowingly aided in breaking a contract they absolutely knew about.

Given the game it is re-skinned from does (Crusaders of Light), yes, yes it will have MTX.

The difference here is the leaked document constitutes STOLEN intellectual property. The website, in taking possession and publishing details of said IP have absolutely broken laws and would lose in court. They wouldn’t have settled otherwise. 

It’s just a re-skin of NetEase’s “Crusaders of Light”

No joke, put some gameplay vids side by side.

Would it kill ya to include a picture of the printer? 

A car is compared to a car. Nothing is unfair. 

Agreed, but your username isn’t really helping my case here :-P

I did, and does the headline state “1 2 3" no, no it doesn’t, the headline was specifically worded “ranked ABOVE Tesla”

Because it getting 1st isn’t important, what’s important to jalop is to state it’s better than Tesla. That’s very specific wording on the authors part.

Just couldn’t resist phrasing the title as a knock on Tesla could you? This website I swear