avboden
avboden
avboden

Yeah but do they have one rogue diesel sub captain with a tattoo on his dick?

Haha, if I lived outside of washington, Colorado would be it. My brother lives in Boulder.

Aww yeah, suck it Colorado!! -washintonian.

Never heard of Optibike? They’ve had a motorized bottom bracket for a few years now, much nicer design than the koben’s as well. Cheapest model is $3000 so somewhat in the range of the more expensive koben. Optibike has a crapload more power, not quite the range, but a lot better spec bike overall. The CVT on the

They couldn’t charge her because of her age? pretty sure that’s not how felonies work.

CRS-7, the next launch WILL attempt landing, just like all of the last CRS missions. It’s not until mid-June though. No launches scheduled for May other than the pad abort test.

You see, in Mx, bones don’t break. No no, they shatter.

yes, and some brands break more than others. Ask anyone who works in tech repair or even just a helpdesk, HP’s are by far the most common for hardware failures

5+ years in the computer repair industry, not about owning, it’s about realizing the vast majority of hardware failures I see all the time are from a single company, HP. I’m also not talking about things like harddrive failures.

Fellow Helpdesker! *fistbump* Same here pretty much, 4 years, ran it my last year there, seen a lot of computers come through and HP’s were by far the most common for hardware failures. I still continue to fix computers on the side while i’m in grad school and I still see more hardware failures in HP’s than anything

I’ve never owned an HP. I’m stating this as someone who works in computer repair, by far, and I mean FAR, the most real hardware failures I’ve seen over the last 7 years has been HP every single year.

Stop. Buying. HP. Laptops. Why do people keep doing this to themselves? ESPECIALLY the cheap ones! I can’t tell you how many of them i’ve seen break after barely a year, or even less. Sure they’re better than they used to be, but anything is better than the failure rate they used to have. This is a company that

Sorry you lost me at “best buy” they don’t know squat about the macs they are selling. Their best buy warranty sucks compared to real apple care....no thanks. Just buy it with the standard education discount ($100 off or more) at an apple store or on the online apple student store.

Sorry you lost me at “best buy” they don’t know squat about the macs they are selling. Their best buy warranty sucks

.

in a vacuum! don’t forget that

I did the same when I started riding :-) As for the hover slam, as long as it’s vertical the legs can actually take an okay bit of shock, so there is somewhat a small margin of error. Musk has now confirmed that the issue was with the throttle valve and a phase delay, sounds like they’ll have it fixed for the next try

Okay they’ve got a motor. where’s the rest of the rocket other than in CGI? I’ll bet this thing doesn’t get to space till minimum 2017. The issue with it is small payloads don’t NEED their own rocket. They can go up as secondary payloads on the bigger rockets for the same price, or less.

How can you write this entire article and not mention Klay Thompson even once?

Not an opinion, it’s fact as stated by the company many times. The grasshopper test rocket in the video you linked has specifically been made heavier to allow it to hover, the actual flight rockets can’t do that.

Rockets are only strong vertically, they don’t take horizontal forces well at all. A catch net would likely exert too much horizontal force and leverage on the upper part of the rocket, which would break it and cause it to explode just like it did when it hit the deck with the remaining propellant onboard.

Not to