Uhm, yeah, big name stars, comedy first or otherwise.
Uhm, yeah, big name stars, comedy first or otherwise.
I might give a shit about comic book movies again if they made one about a horse-faced alien who took up Thor’s hammer.
This show was exactly as funny as it should’ve been, which is to say, moderately. Throwing big name stars at a comedy is almost counter-productive. See SNL’s cold opens over the past ~decade.
Nah, I think Andy’s more of a third-party write-in guy, oblivious to the fact that it would’ve been better and more impactful for the world for him to stay at home and watch TV.
Hey, if the whole town publicly exposing and fondling you on multiple occasions doesn’t work for you, hah, I mean, well...
The only difference i see is that nowadays it’s the “step” brother helping out.
It all plays well into the “these are subhumans who can't think for themselves and whose votes shouldn’t count” narrative.
Man, the list of things Trump’s “going to expose” but never does is miles long at this point.
Goddamn, i accidentally clicked on a link in here and went to actual Twitter for a second there, and had to fight an epic internal battle against an overwhelming urge to kill myself.
Yeah, I totally didn’t pick up on the “bootstraps” narrative the author here asserts. Vance’s narrative felt to me more akin to that of many (typically very liberal) people who fled a failing small town to find success in a big city, ie “boy, that was rough, glad I got out".
I guess it depends on your definition of “fun”. I remember going to the HoF in the 90s when I was like 14 and being like “WTF MADONNA IS IN HERE AND SHE ISNT RAWK AND METALLICA ISNT6!11" and then realizing the HoF is a giant Hard Rock Cafe with fewer chicken wings and that you should look at the shiny costumes and not…
Well what do you expect following Neal Peart’s gambling scandal. He should’ve never been betting on other bands.
I love both, but LOL who the the fuck cares? Half the people accepting these awards sound moderately annoyed to accept them. As always, the question is, who is this for?
It must be really fulfilling for folks like him who derive so much pleasure from strangers' sorrow.
As a Democrat, I feel that the first step toward bipartisanship is to concede the point that party leaders EITHER command a massive child trafficking ring OR drink human blood.
Meh, it at least implies that they want Their Guy to make some concessions, while in truth, many do not feel that way, and will flip shit and yell “sell out" if they do.
“We win” is a hollow, symbolic victory, given that the senate seems lost. We get 4 years of complete and total obstruction of all appointments and legislation, while the GOP rallies its base around “do nothing” democrats. 2010 redux.
Christ, this really is the worst. Every conspiratorial dumbass in the country was bound to go extra-nuts over anything other than a landslide. If Trump loses now we’ll have to listen to their deep-state, stolen-election-bullshit for years to come.
“Kind of”?
I’ll never understand why there are adults out there who think they need some formal excuse to dress up and get drunk.