OTOH, it’s always fun to reference conspiracy theories in conversation.

Brush your teeth dude, damn.

Your anecdotal situation does not disprove my point. You are one person, and I said that the number of people cross shopping them is very small. Besides, it seems to me the only reason to choose the GTI is because you need the storage and/or passenger space. Which would indicate to me that you left a requirement off…

DOLBY VISION!?!?!?!?!?

Nobody with a tie knot that big can be trusted.

His answer is correct, but his justification is wrong.

Being British (and seemingly quite intelligent), he likely doesn’t give a shit, but this is one of those things that you have to give up on, lest you seem like a pretentious dick. Like how I will knowingly use “who” when whom would be correct. Or when I end a sentence on preposition because not doing so would sound…

The real answer to the question is that the number of people cross shopping these two cars is so ridiculously small it renders this comparison pointless. The very fact that Westbrook couldn’t give us an actual answer is proof enough of that.

“Should I get a Miata or a GTI?” is a way more common question than you may think, and for good reason.

How, exactly, is a TT sedan not an A5 Sportback?

There is a kid I went to high school with who looks like just like Melo, if Melo were white. I saw him for the first time in a while when he gave the worst Best Man speech I’ve ever heard at my cousin’s wedding. So I know how OKC felt.

Nice.

Uh, OK, except Roberts did recuse himself...

I’m nearly certain it will be better. For one thing, my 2017 Jetta with a traditional gas engine gets better than that, and the Mazda will A) be lighter than your CR-V, and B) is not AWD. Even with the same engine it would do better, just like a Civic with the same engine as your car does better.

I'm not interested in EPA fuel economy rating at all. I’m interested in the actual fuel economy.

The Kotaku review said the controls are wonky, but every other review I’ve read has praised them.

You’re confusing realism with detail and pacing. Is it realistic that one shot to the chest will kill any person in the game, but Arthur can take many times that before he dies? Is it realistic that if you leave your horse anywhere and end up far away you’re stuck without it, but if you steal a wagon and ride it…

No it isn’t, you’re just impatient. Can you really play a game with this level of detail and think the controls are broken, or were not intentionally set up the way they are?

I’ve put in at least 8-10 hours (a trifle compared to many, I know) on Xbox One X outputting to a 55" OLED TV, and I fail to see how quality can be improved upon. That said, I’m not a PC gamer.

Is this just in case all the scales in the world are lost or destroyed and we have to make new ones, or what?