And not have to look long or drive long to get to a station, or worry if it’ll have the right nozzle.

GM often does this on purpose. They want to start production slowly, and they want to introduce it in a few friendly markets before going mainstream.

You didn’t get through the fourth paragraph of the article, did you?

I’m sure you can make it work,

How’s the Jag a better GT car with no room for luggage? The Corvette is a road trip master.

I say that as if electronics are not moving parts nor high-temperature bulbs. I say that as if automotive electronics are generally very robust and long-lived.

Subaru fixed the nose and it still didn’t sell. They didn’t disguise the tall doors well enough, so it looked like a minivan posing as an SUV, and the restyle made the nose look like a Chrysler, specifically a Town & Country. D’oh.

While it probably means that United is going to take it in the shorts when this passenger sues them, you can bet they’re already drafting the addition to the Definitions section of their contract that “boarding” applies until the plane has disembarked from the gate, even as their PR and policy people pledge that such…

You’re not alone — GM has had no trouble selling Stingrays and their more expensive siblings. I just can’t get there, performance be damned.

The bulbs in such housings should be lasting much longer.

Yes, it’s worrisome, but not so bad for popular models where there isn’t a fundamental design flaw. When the supply of new parts gets thin or is unfavorably priced, picked parts will take their place. And diagnostics have gotten better as the engines have gotten more complex.

Don’t be so dim — the more expensive the headlight, the more likely it’s protected by crash avoidance technology. Y’all are making too much of this problem and need to lighten up.

Striking is what you say when you can’t say beautiful.

There’s also the other Jalopnik answer: what idiot would ever buy a car new? or settle for stock performance? You could buy an X for $tiny and with $tiny*2 in mods run rings around that Jag and everything else.

True but the Corvette can’t be had with a Jaguar body.

Maybe I’m an odd duck, but I find hairy four-cylinders less unpleasant-sounding than hairy V6s. There’s always a blatt sound to a V6 exhaust note.

Ingenium inline six.

I bet the manual disappears entirely once they put their new inline six in the middle of the range.

With the same transmission it’s $62,700, but even that $2,800 gap isn’t much. That suggests the 340hp V6 will be discontinued or will get more standard features. I’m betting discontinued, because the V6 is supercharged while this four-pot has a turbo, and Jaguar’s reaching for better CO2 emissions.

Now compare the 2001 Taurus to the 2007 Jaguar XK.