2wd 3.2L XC90 is 4667lbs.

I know, but it doesn't change the fact that the UK uses "mpg" for fuel economy ratings.

I would hope that it weighs less than a Yukon. If it weighs the same, or more, that would be a 1000 pound increase over the outgoing model.

On the plus side, the seats are incredibly comfortable. So even though legroom is a little low, especially with a taller driver, sitting back there doesn't feel like a chore.

"A small company" with an $11 billion backing by a large corporate parent. Volvo, as an individual brand, may be small but they were given a strong cash infusion from Geely.

Even my S80 has surprisingly little legroom in the back.

From what I've heard the T8 is definitely coming to the US as the top of the line XC90 model. The big question is whether a similar diesel variant (or any diesels at all) will come here.

Except for in the UK, which also uses miles per gallon.

I don't know why you find it unlikely. If you choose to not believe the obvious fact that a Trailblazer simply cannot lock you inside (the front doors) that's fine. It's pretty obvious the guy was just panicking.

From my experience many CPO cars aren't actually run through the tests and reconditioning they say they are. Most of the time if the car meets the basic qualifications they just slap the CPO title on it and sell it with the warranty. If any issues come up they're fixed under the warranty anyway.

I can tell you where the manual lock is in my car. I can also tell you where the manual lock is in various other cars I've owned/been inside of. Power door locks, at least in these cars, are an extra convenience on top of the manual operation of the locks. They don't replace the manual operation of the locks. Had he…

The fact is, he purchased the car the week before and in all likelihood was unaware of how to manually unlock the door in a panic inducing situation.

Yes. All Trailblazers, and the platform cousins, have the same type of manual door locks directly above the handle.

I'm perfectly fine with a distracted driver having this if it means they won't sideswipe or rear end me on the highway. The people who rely on a system like this, rather than using it as an emergency backup, are the same people who'd be distracted behind the wheel regardless.

It was likely a hired vehicle/company rather than one that was created by Hyundai for the commercial shoot.

There's no denying that the photo would then not "match" but at the same time, he isn't in full-on drag where you can't tell what he looks like. That's why the entire thing is so laughable because the kid doesn't really look any different without the makeup. It's obviously still him. It's essentially a big deal over…

Well...that's the thing. He DID apply as a male. The problem is that because he's male, they claim he can't wear makeup, even though makeup doesn't define someones sex/gender and he basically looks the same without it.

Nope. He identifies as a male, not as as female (in general, not just on the application). He isn't trans, just non-conforming.

He's not transgender. The article title is assuming something that isn't true. He identifies as a male, he just dresses without regard to gender norms.

I was hoping someone had a picture of our local EXT. I've seen it driving around many times but I never knew if it was actually being used for patrol or other purposes.