It makes sense to me that the people who put the most time and effort into their bodies and are, as a result of that, the most conventionally attractive, would be promoted. I don’t see what the problem is.

Do you honestly think you have the muscle composition of either of these professional athletes? What a stupid comparrison. I’m sorry but your metabolism does not account for that much weight gain. There’s a reason the percentage of overweight people has increased year by year and it isn’t because people’s metabolisms…

How can “thin privilege” be real any more than “non-smokers privilege” is? You get to choose your weight and your health by how much you eat. You can choose to be fat or skinny. You can choose whether you smoke or not. Smokers face the scrutiny of many non-smokers just like the obese face the scrutiny of those who…

Sure, being a little underweight might be better than being a little overweight. That doesn’t make being overweight a positive thing though, and that certainly doesn’t make obesity a good thing. You’re clearly over eating if you’re at that height and weight, it’s just a fact a physics that you can’t create energy…

The problem might be that you eat the same amount as someone almost a foot taller than you? Also just because you are not seeing any health issues at the moment does not mean they will not come up later. This is like someone who just took up smoking claiming that their habit is perfectly healthy because they do not…

It makes you obese.

The average woman is overweight.

We’re one of the fattest countries in the world... do you honestly believe that?

How is it a “privlege”...? Anyone can be thin, it’s not like you’re born that way. Have some self control and eat a little less if you’re fat. Good lord.

So by BMI she is by definition overweight (fat) but you’re saying she doesn’t get to call herself fat unless she’s morbidly obese?

No... it’s because that height and weight would put you at a 26 bmi which is over weight. lol.