Isn't that a problem then? These are the people that made Skyrim. Skyrim! An incredible and expansive game! But they can't figure out memory? Come on——-every single system has issues and glitches with Skyrim. Hell, even this article implies the glitches he's already seen in this new DLC are incidental and…

Yes, and again, adding horse armor isn't good enough DLC. That's why it wasn't released that way for ALL systems. Only the best DLC, the important DLC, makes it to all systems when it comes to Bethesda. That's WHY it makes it to all systems, not the other way around. Let's face it, the "system issues" argument…

Also, one more thing for the record, the other two DLC's weren't delayed for any systems——they simply weren't released at all for all systems. Dragonborn is supposed to be, and lo and behold, there is an article right here on Kotaku saying it's teh first Skyrim DLC that actually feels like an important expansion.

But then you're ignoring that all systems, not just PS3, have technical issues. If the DLC is good enough, they work through them.

@Brahahahha——-it's not like they can't make PS3 DLC (after all, they say this one is coming out for PS3 & PC together), and it's not like PC or 360 DLC don't have technical difficulties. The bottom line is if the DLC ever IS that good, they will make it for everyone. Building houses and adding vampire quests don't…

Boycott? Nobody's boycotting anything. It's not like they can't make DLC for Skyrim on the PS3. After all, they're putting this one on PS3. So maybe it actually WILL be good enough on any platform. Maybe it will actually be important.

Easier to port over? They're bringing Dragonborn DLC to the PS3. It's not like it's not possible to make PS3 Skyrim DLC. Just not worth it UNLESS the DLC is that good. It hasn't been. Maybe Dragonborn is, and maybe the fact that they're porting it to PS3 is enough of an indication since we can't play it yet…

No, I haven't played Dragonborn——that's exactly my point. Dragonborn is the first DLC being made for all platforms as one of the best-selling and biggest games of this console generation's cycle. I think the fact the Dragonborn DLC IS going to be on all platforms should help explain why I wouldn't buy the other…

I disagree. It's not like they said they were explicitly making 360 timed-release DLC, or that the DLC wasn't being made for PS3. This one (Dragonborn) they say is coming to PS3. Go on and tell me how good the home editor DLC was and how important it was to the Elder Scrolls series.

No. Again, what I'm saying is I want content that's good enough to release on every platform, content that is essential to the cannon of the series.

Who cares? I'm calling BS on all their DLC for Skyrim so far; It simply can't be that important if it's not good enough to make or delay for some systems. It’s not like Rockstar releases DLC just for one system—-they make hundreds of millions to DELAY the DLC, but Bethesda is making zero dollars to make the DLC…

I think it makes sense to assume the DLC isn't good (or at least not worth the price and time) for those reasons.

I don't think it's a raw deal, I think it tells you everything you need to know about if it's good or how little importance it has to the Elder Scrolls cannon. If it were good enough they would take hundreds of millions of dollars to delay the DLC like Rockstar does. Instead, they make it exclusive, but for free? …

Who cares? I don't have a PS3, but if any of the DLC was good enough it wouldn't just be on 360. The game is so huge without DLC, I'm calling BS on all their DLC; It simply can't be that important if it's not good enough for every system. It’s not like Rockstar releases DLC just for one system—-they make hundreds…