cars started getting bigger for “safety” reasons.
cars started getting bigger for “safety” reasons.
Strange considering that modern cars have higher hoods, automatic braking, etc. All these features are supposed to be safer for pedestrians. Though anecdotally, it seems around me every jogger runs into the street without looking and is then shocked when there are cars there. I learned in kindergarten that you’re…
This isn’t unexpected... Insurance companies are FOR PROFIT... When California doesn’t allow them to raise home insurance costs to cover the expensive wildfire damages in the last decade, they’re gonna try to raise other costs to cover that shit.
Seriously? Do y’all stall your cars so often that you have a hard time believing that someone never stalls?
But what about the fREe MaRkeT???
The EPA is somewhat a victim of its own success. Our country was nasty when the EPA created, but hardly anyone alive right now remembers how it was before the EPA.
Florida really doesn’t want anyone to live there or visit.
Republicans opposed the EPA rules, finalized in December, saying they are too challenging to implement, will increase supply chain costs and will make trucks too expensive for small business owners.
Airplanes carry 2-300 passengers. Just the difference in the average weight of a person in the ‘70s versus now would be enough to upset the CoG, takeoff speed, etc. And that’s before the additional fuel required to transport additional weight.
EVs are appliances. What’s next? Our refrigerators will start making vroom-vroom sounds? I’d rather let ICE + manuals die a dignified death than go this route.
You can press it as soon as the 2 is all the way down for a boost...
Meanwhile, there’s a whole group of fatties sueing the airlines that they be accommodated with larger seats and only have to buy one.
Do you think that somehow doing fewer inspections will improve safety? How does that work?
Many here -myself included- are old enough to remember that Texas was the last state to criminalize having an open container of alcohol in a vehicle while being driven. Let’s bring that back. And child labor. And let’s roll back all progressive laws over the last 120 years, in fact. Ban interracial marriage. Make all…
The “men” throwing kicking and screaming tantrums over not having 100% of representation are the same ones who insist representation doesn’t matter.
I’d like to live in a world where we ignore misogynists. I can only imagine it is not the majority of gamers that are upset and just a small percentage of basement dwelling cave trolls. We need to stop giving them the attention they so desperately crave
I need a lot more data on this one. If the self driving car identified the dog 75 feet down the road while traveling at 25 mph that is quite different than the dog jumped off the curb and stepped into the vehicles path 20 feet in front while going 50 mph. If the accident was reasonably avoidable by a human driver then…
This is dramatized clickbait. The car was successfully able to note a sudden obstruction in the road, which is a good thing. You can’t expect the car to magically be able to stop faster than it is already capable of. If anything, I would assume it was able to notice the dog and get on the brakes sooner than a human…
Just because it recognized it doesn’t mean it was in a position to avoid the outcome, right? This seems like it is written to intimate that the car “saw” the dog, identified it as a dog, and then made a decision to plow into it.
My argument is mainly getting rid of the gauge cluster. I hate that so much.