asbsvc
asbsvc
asbsvc

Indeed. Because driving is sooooooo dangerous and sooooo hard that an American could not possibly be bothered to actually pay attention and drive without a robot. Being fat sweaty lazy slobs has consequences people. Usually those consequences end up harming our world.

Interesting comments re the 348. The current issue of FORZA (No. 140, April 2015) has a 348 Buyer's Guide along with some period comments about the car. Some guys say it was too twitchy. Then again, some of FORZA's staff argued that the twitchiness can be contained with skill, thanks to the terrific feedback. On

God that is so dumb. Light cars are cramped and uncomfortable. Safety and creature comforts are all that matter. Why do you insist on being able to see out of your car? My Kia has free maintenance and a sensor that tells me when I cannot change lanes. Stop being such a dinosaur.

Precisely how offended would you be if the Iranians drove their naval vessels up and down the east coast?

That r8 is one cool looking beast.

Potentially dumb question. Will the new Scirocco be at Geneva this year?

Slab sided? Check. Dreadful surface details? Check. Full Retard Spec LED? Check. Appalling rearward visibility? Check and Check.

sigh. too right.

here is some good design work.

Patrick,

Well that certainly takes the sting off...

Gary, please stop posting reasonable responses on Jalopnik. It makes me upset.

Sorry. I meant to say that I think most new cars have high belt lines and major blindspots.

I wish that were so. My '12 GTI has remarkably poor visibility. My '86 GTI has superb visibility.

This needed to be said. Thank you

Really not much of a Continental guy but all is forgiven here. BECAUSE RACECAR

Hahaha, it reminded me of the roundel on the side of a Spitfire. The plane not the car.

thanks

Potentially stupid question. If you configure a car online do you still get nailed for dealer markups?

"I feel like it's got classicness designed into it"- Popolac on the new GT.