Dark Schneider? They called their character “Dark Schneider”? What the hell did they do that for? Did they thought the English speaking audience would think it sounds cool?

Dustin is to Stranger Things what the Jamie Kennedy character was to Scream. Randy may not have been the lead but his fourth wall breaking is what we remember the franchise for. Likewise, Dustin represents the DnD angle, even if other characters are also DnD players.

That’s the point I was trying to make. Saying a deal does not respect the clause of an oral agreement has to be unbelievably hard to prove.

There’s allegedly no contract. The article says it’s an oral agreement, if that.

Here’s a summary of what we saw of Wanda so far:

Page did not “went off” on him. He rightfully criticized him for promoting a homophobic church but that was it. He didn’t said Pratt was himself homophobic and I don’t think the exchange can be qualified as a feud.

Honestly, I asked myself the same questions. Those are definitely nerdy questions but, hey, I am a nerd.

I’m still waiting for the flashback scene that explains why Reva hates Obi-Wan so much but it’s getting very late. I don’t understand what the show is waiting for because I’m not expecting the reveal to be that shocking (she’s probably angry he didn’t come back to save her during Order 66, hence “no one is coming to…

It has nothing to do with either of them and they shouldn’t see any impact in the short term future. Keywords are obligated to respect any deal they already signed, even if it’s no longer as profitable for them as it used to be.

Kristen Stewart is someone who managed to “get away” with switching between designer dress and suits whenever she feels like it. For what it’s worth, I do like her style most of the times. Maybe we’re evolving. Or maybe she’s just big enough to force Hollywood to change its views.

Having a word of French origin isn’t the same as keeping the exact word, without taking into account the different pronunciation between both languages. For example, French kept “Internet” because it pronounces mostly the same, but not “e-mail” because it doesn’t.

... and that backstory has to take into account that Obi-Wan is already feeling responsible for Darth Vader, and that it would be a pretty bad look if both villains of your show had the exact same motivation.

This series has the same root problem that Solo and The Book of Boba Fett had. It’s Disney expanding on a story that doesn’t need to be expanded, just because they had a character they liked. They were so happy that they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should.

I saw a video on Youtube that defended his dialogues. While it did not change my mind enough to make me think they were good, it did gave me a bit of perspective and made me understand the method behind the madness. No, they’re not realistic, but they’re not meant to be. They’re meant to be functional, expositional,…

Disney Plus’ latest Star Wars spin-off arrives with a somewhat surprising appearance from a certain princess

I don’t deny that he could have meant that, but the quote’s last line seems to imply that he’s blaming the show, not the reaction.

First of all, Loki’s “coming out” scene was not a coming out scene. The character is canonically several thousand years old and has made peace with his sexuality years ago - if he ever had any issue with it, which there is no evidence of. Why is this important? Well, a coming out is a big deal, while just mentioning…

I can acknowledge that the article is on topic with the website’s mandate, and find its content counterproductive at the same time.

This article has more words than her coming out scene. I really don’t think putting the character under a microscope like that is any help.

The “lack of exclusivity” criticism feels like someone tried to port the console war argument into another Xbox-related debate, and didn’t take the time to consider whether it applied or not.