armyofchuckness
armyofchuckness
armyofchuckness

Then, yes. That is the place it shall be put...bathed in neon green lighting.

I would buy it, put it in a clear, bulletproof case, put it in front of Bugatti's head quarters and secure it to the ground like it was a leg of the St. Louis Arch. If it's legally a Bugatti (which appears to be the case), it must be remembered, if only to serve as a warning to other brands that drift in and out of

It's true. I have to pull myself back from blathering on about my car more than I'd like. Of course, if I wasn't that crazy about it, I wouldn't be wasting all my time and money on fixing it back up.

That's a legit reason. I was not aware of that.

I still find it odd that Chrysler is killing the brand that has become synonymous with the minivan platform as a whole. It's like Kimberly Clark saying it's going to end the Kleenex brand in favor of developing Cottonelle facial tissues. The Town and Country was always the least recognized of the three original

Those cars are awesome! You, sir, are a connoisseur.

I would agree, but I'm afraid scarcity is pushing 71+ Charger/RR owners into the same territory as the earlier owners. They are still miles away from 68-70 B body owners though. There's really no point engaging with those guys anymore.

I do need that T-shirt. Thank you for making me aware of it.

You've been talking to some crazy Valiant owners if they were talking WWII era military engines. The Flathead 6 was never put in the Valiant. It started with the relatively sophisticated brand-spanking new Slant 6 in 1960, which as far as I know...

Seriously, though. I'm grateful these will provide American jobs. That being said, I've never really seen the point of the Colorado. If you're gonna build a compact truck, build a compact truck. Midsize trucks seem completely unnecessary. "Oh, I need to haul slightly more than an S10, but just a bit less than a

As a Valiant owner, I've become a Mopar enthusiast by proxy, and I have to agree with both assessments, although I would have to say the latter of the two needs further refinement. That statement carries much more weight if the Mopar enthusiast in question is a B or E body owner. (Especially if they're an E body

iSee what you did there.

Very well then. Carry on.

My gut is giving me all kinds of danger signals. Something about the fit of the seat covers and the alignment of the hood tips me off to bigger problems than the wheels. I would love to have a 68-69 Vette drop top, but there's got to be something wrong with this kind of price tag.

Or this:

For that kind of money I'd rather swap that A for a G.

Hey, hey, hey! Watch what you're calling a clunker. I still wince when I watch that scene...because I hate seeing an old Dart take damage.

That is the most ridiculous breakdown of cars by class I've ever seen.

To the right collector (and by collector I mean: someone desperate to capture a piece of childhood left behind in an '89 MR2) it might be worth 5k. But that's some serious nostalgia money for a nearly 25 year old Toyota. Hopefully your friend finds just such a person. (Although I will admit a clutch supercharger is

Okay, that gave me a chuckle.