@Graverobber: I agree with this submission.

The Convoy Rubber Duck.

@Slant,sick with the DOTS DTs: I think the Countach was the only I-talian car I ever had on the wall. I recall many more things with Plymouth logos on them being the dominant theme.

@georgejetson: Hear hear. I actually dig the '74 Charger. It works well on the show "Burn Notice."

@Brady Butterfield: Whoo! My thoughts exactly. *1978 sucks five*

@78_elky: There's nothing wrong with owning and liking a 1978 car. I'm just saying that by then, even the El Caminos (I'm assuming by your SN you have an Elco), didn't have the "muscular" look the 77 model possessed. I'm glad, for your sake, that you do like it. I can appreciate having an underloved model year with my…

I would say any year 1975 and after would be the worst for the Charger. At least it still looked like a charger in 1974. (Also, lest we forget, the 1974 Dodge Monaco would make quite a name for itself a short six years later.)

In the US, any year between 1967 and 1972 could be pulled out of a hat and argued effectively. It was the peak of American muscle and the last gasp of fun before the long lines of malaise and cocaine fueled decades to follow swallowed them up.

No muscle cars, classics, or vintage imports/econo boxes, but "jacked up truck" makes an appearance. *sigh*

@Slant,sick with the DOTS DTs: Also, there's a year you forgot:

@Slant,sick with the DOTS DTs: And lest we forget, Valiant was in fact its own brand from 1960-1964. It was Valiant by Plymouth.

1. Be the Quintessential American Car Company.

The layout! It hurts!

It has no side view mirrors because with Chrysler, there's no looking back!

Gotta go with the 1964 Valiant on this one. (Wonder why?)

Please don't ever stop doing these.

Mine.

@Slantsick, Murilee's lovechild: What? No '64 Valiant?

@UDMan: This list gets you a little red heart from me. Kudos for the '77 Can Am.

@Syrax can't find a G-Class in Brazil: Whoa. Something unexpected happened at the end.