If that is the case then why couldn’t they bring back the Tomcat as a second-generation model in this sequel versus using the Super Hornet like we are doing in our reality, hmmm?!  They made the movie “Stealth” using fictional jets so why not do the same with Top Gun Maverick?  Using the Super Hornet as the main jet…

You left out one more mistake. Movies are supposed to be fictional and movie special effects have evolved greatly since the 1980s. Why is Maverick flying a Super Hornet in this movie when they could have easily created a simulated ASF-14 type jet to serve as a fictional second-generation Tomcat in service with the…

The F-35 doesn’t have thrust vectoring like the F-22 did.  With the costs to develop the thing, thrust vectoring would have killed the program!  Furthermore, thrust vectoring is over-rated and for a stealth jet it is really not needed when these things must fly as smooth as possible to not get pinged on radar.  Thrust…

I won’t be impressed until I can see the F-35 perform maneuvers FULLY ARMED and FULLY FUELED, under combat load conditions, that a combat loaded F-22 or F-15 or F-16 can pull off. However, based on the Paris air show that used a lightly loaded demonstration F-35, I think we all will be pretty bored with a combat…

Well, that is why you try to fight wars efficiently and cheaply, until the need for super weapons that are ultra-expensive, is necessary to end the war, quickly! A case in point, using the A-10 Warthog to fight our war against ISIS versus using the F-35 with very expensive smart bombs, against ISIS. Bullets are always…

“You’ve in part blamed the collapse of the tech bubble for HP’s problems. You were the leader there, did you play any role in HP’s troubles at that time?”