The point is that it isn’t poorly edited or translated or re-edited. This is how the next president talks.

Amount of stars aside, you're objectively right. Pathetic attempt at humor

Then the intellectually honest criticism of Brooks’ post would be to point to the litany of justifiable reasons people have for disliking her in addition to the irrational one of misogyny. Those would be (buckle up):

Odd tweet by Getty—I could have sworn the bloody shocker was a move invented by a Duke student athlete.

Nate Diaz is like your drunk older cousin who’s kinda cool but also scares the shit out of you and you hope you never end up like him.

Do you just deliberately pick misleading titles or do you not read your own blog?