Fuck your click-bait title...

Are you aware you can by a female sex doll right now? Don’t think they offer males yet because there’s probably not a market yet.

We live in a world where the Real Doll® exists. It’s not much of a jump to sexbots.

Pretty much every married and/or cohabitating couple I know says that exact same thing— the ultimate fantasy arrangement would be for each person to have next-door houses or apartments! You love spending fuckloads of time with each other, and you love doing many of the same things, but you like having your own space…

...it’s pretty clear from his last sentence that the steering wheel-free car is really the only safe option here.

I have to admit, she's certainly... Well built...

I feel like Jezebel has been doing this case and its readers a huge disservice with their dishonest reporting when it comes to this case. It seems they are less interested in the nuances of what is actually happening here and more interested in drumming up as much outrage as possible. I get that shit like that drives…

Yes, every non-lawyer loves to scream that justice delayed is justice denied. There’s only one problem with that... justice denied is justice denied.

Also by default search results reflect your personal search history and probably other individual factors like location. Probably the autocomplete results reflect something about other people and e.g. the mood of the country in general, but it’d be pretty difficult to pin down exactly what....

Yeah, I often wonder if they know that these search term suggestions are different for each user.

You’re forgetting the other all too important aspect of a modern and just society: we innocent until proven guilty.

Thanks! So is the position that the court failed her not absurd? I mean we don’t know if this guy is in fact abusive. He’s never had his day in court. Also, she’s not being forced to work with her aleged abuser since Sony has allowed her to work with industry professionals other than him. Nothing about this article…

Not really paternalistic.

I don’t understand... So she asked a judge to dissolve a legally binding contract based on rumors that this guy is abusive? Did she first prove in court that this guy abused her?

That system can be described many ways, but “paternalistic” it is not. It assumes that every individual is capable of being his (or her) own advocate.

Not sure what article you read, but it clearly wasn’t mine.

Ah, yes, violence. The thing to say about it, of course, is how beautiful it is.

“They don’t offer a single burger under 1100 KCals. That’s without sides, which come with.”

No, he wants certain people to know the email address. I’m fairly certain he does not want that email address to go out on a site like Gizmodo in an article that is clearly mocking him.

According to the memo accompanying the release, this email contained information covered by attorney-client privilege in the case Welch v. Brown, an unrelated lawsuit relating to retirement benefits of city employees. This claim seems to be supported by the subject line.