aquila121
aquila121
aquila121

Let's keep pushing to change those current realities, then. I agree, President "Grab 'Em By the Pussy" and "Rapey McBeerface" are giant neon-signs of how far we have left to go before evil men are held accountable, but at the same time, it's not over. And at the bare minimum, their existence and rise to power despite

Do you use that same argument to defend sweatshops? Because that seems like a logical conclusion that can be drawn. And if so, you're a dick.

So glad I have your approval. /s Also, parroting, seriously? Are you five?

Same. Fuck that guy, now and forever.

I’m surprised that he went to this fundraiser after getting publicly called out for it the night before. I shouldn’t be, but I am—and now, I remain surprised that Biden denied taking money from fossil fuels *while there* after the connection was expressly pointed out to him. Again, I know that I shouldn’t be.

Chucklefuck, I meant to reply to you, not dudebra—*You* are not an intelligent person, and no one values what you have to say.

My deepest apologies, I meant to reply to Progressivism’s Chucklefucks with that criticism, not you. I appreciate your wealth of comments, this thread included.

I was thinking more “Randy Quaid with a sub-par beard."

You are not an intelligent person and no one values what you have to say.

Now playing

“She can’t debate any better than Hillary.” Goddamn, I cannot wait to see Warren on the same stage with Biden (right fucking next to him, mind you):

Why would you *not* insist on a manual transmission in a Miata?

I wholeheartedly enjoyed this analogy. Thank you for sharing, and I'm sorry that this guy is no fun and rather bitter.

Good to see you.

Fair. I fall more in the camp of “this prof. was an unknown joking about how Stephens sucks” on Twitter, and this asshole (with a long history of showing how he is indeed a racist-asshole-who-sucks) tried to use his influence to shit on a critic—to me, this absolutely warrants the dragging that has ensued, and I have

And if you’re aware that this friend is unable to pass a background check and purchase guns of their own—NOT OKAY. So really, AOC’s argument boils down to: if common sense gun legislation is passed and you’re concerned about no longer being able to lend your guns to your friends, I guess they’ll have to get their own.

I’d argue that assholes are going to find something, anything (no matter how small) to try to justify their hyper-partisanship. Calling this instance of exceedingly minor hypocrisy equivalent to much more egregious examples from the right is not helpful--one side can go as morally high and perfect as possible, but

Nice.

I think two seconds of thinking should make it obvious that in this scenario Karpf was not using loaded language.

WANT.

That is the longest minute in recent memory.