I say this in the most adoring way possible: sometimes I worry that our society is too far gone; that we don’t deserve a rep as wonderful as AOC has been out of the gate—but goddamn, is she *precisely* what we need to help address the rot in government and the numb indifference of the voters.

I’m a fellow Ohioan, too—I hate that Jordan’s connection to Ohio State University means that millions of Bucknuts will refuse to believe he ever did anything wrong; either in regards to the sexual misconduct which preyed upon the wrestling team, or that he’s a worthless, fear-mongering shitheel in Congress.

Fuck Jim Jordan, forever and always.

I’m thinking there’s a mental capacity similar to a cranky, self-centered five year-old: 'If it doesn’t affect me, I don’t care. If I don’t want to do it, I don’t care what you tell me.’

I’d love to use this moronic line of logic against the gun-nuts, but they’d probably run with dismantling the First Amendment before they’d ever let anyone breathe a word about change to the Second.

I vote the sun.

“Who work hard, who do everything right, but still find themselves disproportionately with lead in their water, super funds in their neighborhood, schools that don’t fund their genius, healthcare disparities that still effect their body and their wellbeing.”

In the interest of preparing for the needs of fully-autonomous vehicles, this would make the most sense, however, I forsee a large amount of pushback in two areas: one, retrofitting older cars never meant to be autonomous (manufactured before the implementation of these communication sensors in everything from now…

It'd be even better if they would overtly endorse his eventual Democratic opponent, but this may be as far as they'll go.

Sad that the only clip I can find of this is censored.

I imagine it would be eerily similar to Trump’s performance in the debates opposite Clinton--but I'm hoping it would impact the final results more than 2016.

I almost want to see Trump’s administration attempt (poorly) to understand Warren’s policies, then attempt to explain them (poorly) to President-never-reads, then have Trump himself mangle regurgitating that on a debate stage so terribly that “covefe” or whatever is seen as eloquent by comparison.

I’m willing to bet that she’d agree with the following: she loves you; she doesn’t want anyone to speak (or even think) ill of the one she loves, including you. Trust that she’s being honest with how she feels about you, and try to internalize the positive things she’s saying.

I can totally understand your worry about someone responding like that, but that hypothetical person would be A: stupid, and B: an asshole. If you’re going to a gym, one of the reasons to do so is to try to improve your health (or feel a little better about your appearance), so criticizing another person for not…

Username checks out. 😁

That team-up would be glorious.

I just want to the difference between Warren and Biden to be displayed head-to-head during a debate as soon as possible. I won’t lie that I’m pulling for Warren, and I think she has the smarts to slow Biden’s “I’m leading because of name recognition and loveable Obama’s BFF memes” to a crawl—and make voters think…

I get where you’re coming from, but even if it’s not technically true, this hits them where it hurts. One, they can’t let this label go unchallenged, because their definition of masculinity revolves around sex—if they’re not “getting some” on the regular, obviously they are lesser men (or not ‘men’ at all, in their…

I was going for something you’d still see in an episode of “The A-Team.”