Sure, we put a man on the moon, and could feasibly engineer a solution so that taller vehicles could clear the bridge, but it’d be moot if we didn’t have dozens of drivers every year who ignore the numerous and outright overt warning systems that say “HEY DUMBASS, YOUR TRUCK WON’T CLEAR THIS—TURN AROUND OR GET WRECKED.

If the sensor system necessitates a redundancy by still having a handle, I don’t really see a purpose in the sensor system replacing the handle’s function. Just my two cents.

*She.

My thought is this when I read his comment: which would you rather free of ice using a scraper—a standard door handle, or some fancy tech touch sensor? Which do you think is more likely to fail over time, especially including exposure to extreme weather conditions? If the door has a thin layer of ice, a handle gives…

At what point do you say, “Okay—that’s enough...”? I mean, two spares on the back, and on the trunk?

On humor merits, yes. But the point Derel1cte made is also valid, and worth mentioning—so let it slide.

Question, McMike: Have we ever seen peak Mustang—a true 5/5 scenario? If so, and you remember it, I’m terrified (but curious) to know what that looks like.

Compared to a Viper or STI or something? Sure. But the difference between the stock Nano and this crazy idea is certainly substantial. This wasn’t conceived to re-write records for acceleration times, it was made to create something that most everyone else would respond to by saying that should not exist.

I was watching that movie and before he got in the Lamborghini, I thought to myself: Man, is it even possible for me to see this character as more of an asshole? I’m not sure...

Tillerson at least called Trump a moron (and sometimes dissented on the direction he’d like from policy), from what I’ve read, people think Pompeo is just going to be a ‘yes man’ sycophant to Trump at best, and a horrible, angry, war-monger asshole to a bunch of other nations, at worst.

What is he going to do with that plunger? Nevermind, I don’t want to know how this works.

I’m dying of laughter. Thank you.

[Vin Diesel mumble-growls something about family]

Cheetah-print heels—really? (I’m not bemoaning your choice, $kay, just saying who still thinks those look good?) The car’s gorgeous, though.

Okay, that would’ve upped the karmic value.

This is the best worst idea.

They’re committed to ten F&F movies, so six impossible missions seems downright reasonable by comparison. These are the circumstances we live in, unfortunately.

I am in love with that assault-your-eyes teal.

Honestly, I agree with you, but I almost don’t want the 370Z to try to return to competing with where the Mustang GT is now. I suggest the 370 should replace the S-chassis in terms of Nissan’s 90's lineup: leave the engine/drivetrain alone (and allow a large portion of the aftermarket support available to stay valid),…

That interior is exactly why it feels so dated. The outside looks fine even by modern standards, and the simple, basic nature of its design appeals to some pickup buyers, I’m sure—but the materials and layout on the inside just depressed me to see it in 2017.