I second this motion; there ought to be something a graphic designer could do with the Korean letter N (ㄴ). And all the rest about Hyundai copying BMW is stupid; at least this letter stands for more than "motorsport", which is about as good as calling it GT or R or S, or something. Nothing against the M people, but…

The noise is...unreal. Cadillac really ought to do some kind of V16 hypercar.

Just making sure that you were intending irony. I know of more than a few feminists who understand feminism, but not gender equality.

You are aware that saying "we'd all point and laugh and see this silly cultural anachronism end the next race" is, in itself, sexist, right? The idea being communicated is that we make women behave in a certain way, and men behave in a different way, and if men were to behave like women, it would only be parody. If…

Passion for engineering, undoubtedly, but. though I have admittedly interacted in no way with this car but through a computer screen, it seems like it may have that at the expense of everything else.

I've always thought that I3's sounded like half of a V6...which it seems like they should, anyway. Actually, as a general rule, most V engines sound, to me, like doubled versions of their inline relatives, from V6 right on through to V12's; not even crossplane V8's are an exception, in comparison to the only…

I like the car, and think it looks great (anyone who says it's a mish-mash of other cars has it right...but then, it's arguable that all cars of the same body style are like that now). But I think if Hyundai really wants the Genesis to be their Lexus LS moment, they're gonna have to spend a bit more than half a…

Kia could price their hypothetical supercar at 95% the 458's price, one which—remember—is that car's equal in performance, and you (and others, I'm sure) would not buy it simply in virtue of the fact that it's a Kia.

...WHY are people so image-obsessed? Why, why? Who gives a crap what badge is on the hood? Do you like the car? Good! Buy it. Don't buy it because of the logo. These are probably the same people that, had their lives been a bit different, would buy Ferrari-branded disposable razorblades for ten bucks a piece.

So, you understand that if you would not buy a Kia simply because it is a Kia, were Kia to build something like a genuinely good Ferrari 458 competitor (and likely sell it for 2/3's the price), you would not even consider it momentarily because it's a Kia? Let's look at the inverse of this situation; Ferrari could…

"The CT200h is no one's idea of a performance car, but it does appeal to someone who wants a Prius but doesn't want to drive a Prius" Or, alternatively, it appeals to someone who wants a Prius but doesn't want to drive something that looks like a 3rd grader's lunchbox.

I don't think most people think of those in the 1920's as being stagnant or regressive. No, my generation is coming to realize that it was the boomers who f-ed everything up, with their unjustified fear of nuclear power being one of the bigger mistakes (in my view).

I don't think most people think of those in the 1920's as being stagnant or regressive. No, my generation is coming to realize that it was the boomers who f-ed everything up, with their unjustified fear of nuclear power being one of the bigger mistakes (in my view).

I don't think most people think of those in the 1920's as being stagnant or regressive. No, my generation is coming to realize that it was the boomers who f-ed everything up, with their unjustified fear of nuclear power being one of the bigger mistakes (in my view).

I don't think most people think of those in the 1920's as being stagnant or regressive. No, my generation is coming to realize that it was the boomers who f-ed everything up, with their unjustified fear of nuclear power being one of the bigger mistakes (in my view).

I don't think most people think of those in the 1920's as being stagnant or regressive. No, my generation is coming to realize that it was the boomers who f-ed everything up, with their unjustified fear of nuclear power being one of the bigger mistakes (in my view).

I don't think most people think of those in the 1920's as being stagnant or regressive. No, my generation is coming to realize that it was the boomers who f-ed everything up, with their unjustified fear of nuclear power being one of the bigger mistakes (in my view).

I don't think most people think of those in the 1920's as being stagnant or regressive. No, my generation is coming to realize that it was the boomers who f-ed everything up, with their unjustified fear of nuclear power being one of the bigger mistakes (in my view).

I don't think most people think of those in the 1920's as being stagnant or regressive. No, my generation is coming to realize that it was the boomers who f-ed everything up, with their unjustified fear of nuclear power being one of the bigger mistakes (in my view).

The length and expense of nuclear power plant construction is due, in part, to the fact that most plants are one-offs, i.e., no efficiency from mass-production. No other type of power plant suffers from this. And the regulation is based on something called the linear-threshold model of nuclear radiation, i.e., there…